Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="warhawk" data-source="post: 33158" data-attributes="member: 431">I posted in another thread that IMO the Pack MUST get at least one good guard before a Bush or Williams could be of help. Sherman put us in a bad spot with no money last year and the only hope was gambling on some guys looking for a second chance. We've got some cash now so we need to get the "O" line shored back up.I'M NOT SOLD ON BUSH. He's got awesome talent around him and a QB that defenses have to respect. Whereas we all new Tomlinson was going to be great because he was great in college when everyone new he was getting the ball. I SAY TRADE DOWN and get Bates some talent in the "D" line and end to replace Jackson and shore up KGB's problems against the run and a LB with some talent as past Barnett we really don't have much.BATES + Mediocre talent= good (this year)BATES + good talent= greatBATES + great talent= AWESOMEWe get a "really" good guard, a "really" good defensive lineman, a "really" good LB, and a "good" RB and we will be "really" good next year. I read where we will have about 21ml. less what it takes to resign the guys we need to keep. That's if the cap goes to 90ml. So the question is can we get the above with that amount of money?</blockquote>

Total: 566 (members: 6, guests: 560)