Page Time: 0.1931s

Memory: 6.7564 MB (Peak: 8.2271 MB)

Queries (40, time: 0.0406s, 21.0%)

  1. SELECT cache_value
    FROM xf_permission_combination
    WHERE permission_combination_id = ?
    Params: 1
    Run Time: 0.000295
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    SIMPLExf_permission_combinationconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
  2. SELECT thread.*
    	,
    		user.gender, user.avatar_date, user.gravatar,
    		NULL AS thread_read_date,
    		0 AS thread_reply_banned,
    		0 AS thread_is_watched,
    		'' AS draft_message, NULL AS draft_extra
    FROM xf_thread AS thread
    
    		LEFT JOIN xf_user AS user ON
    			(user.user_id = thread.user_id)
    WHERE thread.thread_id = ?
    Params: 39156
    Run Time: 0.000573
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    SIMPLEthreadconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
    SIMPLEuserconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
  3. SELECT node.*, forum.*
    	,
    	permission.cache_value AS node_permission_cache,
    		NULL AS forum_read_date
    FROM xf_forum AS forum
    INNER JOIN xf_node AS node ON (node.node_id = forum.node_id)
    
    	LEFT JOIN xf_permission_cache_content AS permission
    		ON (permission.permission_combination_id = 1
    			AND permission.content_type = 'node'
    			AND permission.content_id = forum.node_id)
    WHERE node.node_id = ?
    Params: 20
    Run Time: 0.000384
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    SIMPLEforumconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
    SIMPLEnodeconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
    SIMPLEpermissionconstPRIMARYPRIMARY35const,const,const1 
  4. SELECT EWRporta2_articles.*, xf_thread.*, xf_post.*, xf_user.*, EWRporta2_authors.*
    FROM EWRporta2_articles
    	INNER JOIN xf_thread ON (xf_thread.thread_id = EWRporta2_articles.thread_id)
    	INNER JOIN xf_post ON (xf_post.post_id = xf_thread.first_post_id)
    	LEFT JOIN xf_user ON (xf_user.user_id = xf_thread.user_id)
    	LEFT JOIN EWRporta2_authors ON (EWRporta2_authors.user_id = xf_thread.user_id)
    WHERE EWRporta2_articles.thread_id = ?
    Params: 39156
    Run Time: 0.001306
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    SIMPLE       Impossible WHERE noticed after reading const tables
  5. SELECT EWRporta2_articles.*, EWRporta2_authors.*, xf_thread.*, xf_post.*, xf_user.*
    FROM xf_thread
    	INNER JOIN xf_post ON (xf_post.post_id = xf_thread.first_post_id)
    	LEFT JOIN xf_user ON (xf_user.user_id = xf_thread.user_id)
    	LEFT JOIN EWRporta2_authors ON (EWRporta2_authors.user_id = xf_thread.user_id)
    	LEFT JOIN EWRporta2_articles ON (EWRporta2_articles.thread_id = xf_thread.thread_id)
    WHERE xf_thread.thread_id = ?
    Params: 39156
    Run Time: 0.001002
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    SIMPLExf_threadconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
    SIMPLExf_postconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
    SIMPLExf_userconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
    SIMPLEEWRporta2_authorsconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const0unique row not found
    SIMPLEEWRporta2_articlesconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const0unique row not found
  6. SELECT post.*
    	,
    		bb_code_parse_cache.parse_tree AS message_parsed, bb_code_parse_cache.cache_version AS message_cache_version,
    		user.*, IF(user.username IS NULL, post.username, user.username) AS username,
    		user_profile.*,
    		user_privacy.*,
    		signature_parse_cache.parse_tree AS signature_parsed, bb_code_parse_cache.cache_version AS signature_cache_version,
    		session_activity.view_date AS last_view_date,
    		0 AS like_date
    		,(select sum(count_received) from dark_postrating_count where user_id = post.user_id and rating in (1,2,4,5,6,7,8,10)) as positive_rating_count
    	
    		,(select sum(count_received) from dark_postrating_count where user_id = post.user_id and rating in (14,11,12,13)) as negative_rating_count
    	
    		,(select sum(count_received) from dark_postrating_count where user_id = post.user_id and rating in (3,9)) as neutral_rating_count
    	,
    pr_cache.rating_cache,
    pr2.rating
    FROM xf_post AS post
    
    		LEFT JOIN xf_bb_code_parse_cache AS bb_code_parse_cache ON
    			(bb_code_parse_cache.content_type = 'post' AND bb_code_parse_cache.content_id = post.post_id)
    		LEFT JOIN xf_user AS user ON
    			(user.user_id = post.user_id)
    		LEFT JOIN xf_user_profile AS user_profile ON
    			(user_profile.user_id = post.user_id)
    		LEFT JOIN xf_user_privacy AS user_privacy ON
    			(user_privacy.user_id = post.user_id)
    		LEFT JOIN xf_bb_code_parse_cache AS signature_parse_cache ON
    			(signature_parse_cache.content_type = 'signature' AND signature_parse_cache.content_id = post.user_id)
    		LEFT JOIN xf_session_activity AS session_activity ON
    			(post.user_id > 0 AND session_activity.user_id = post.user_id AND session_activity.unique_key = CAST(post.user_id AS BINARY))
    left join dark_postrating_post_cache pr_cache ON (post.post_id = pr_cache.post_id)
    left join dark_postrating pr2 on (post.post_id = pr2.post_id and pr2.user_id = 0)
    WHERE post.thread_id = ?
    	 AND (post.position >= 50 AND post.position < 75) 
    	AND (post.message_state IN ('visible'))
    ORDER BY post.position ASC, post.post_date ASC
    Params: 39156
    Run Time: 0.004167
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    PRIMARYpostrangethread_id_post_date,thread_id_positionthread_id_position8 24Using where; Using filesort
    PRIMARYbb_code_parse_cacheeq_refcontent_type_idcontent_type_id31const,packerfo_maindb.post.post_id1 
    PRIMARYusereq_refPRIMARYPRIMARY4packerfo_maindb.post.user_id1 
    PRIMARYuser_profileeq_refPRIMARYPRIMARY4packerfo_maindb.post.user_id1 
    PRIMARYuser_privacyeq_refPRIMARYPRIMARY4packerfo_maindb.post.user_id1 
    PRIMARYsignature_parse_cacheeq_refcontent_type_idcontent_type_id31const,packerfo_maindb.post.user_id1 
    PRIMARYsession_activityeq_refPRIMARYPRIMARY22packerfo_maindb.post.user_id,func1 
    PRIMARYpr_cacheeq_refPRIMARYPRIMARY4packerfo_maindb.post.post_id1 
    PRIMARYpr2eq_refpost_id_user_id,post_id_rating,user_id_ratingpost_id_user_id8packerfo_maindb.post.post_id,const1 
    DEPENDENT SUBQUERYdark_postrating_countrefuser_id_ratinguser_id_rating4packerfo_maindb.post.user_id4Using where
    DEPENDENT SUBQUERYdark_postrating_countrefuser_id_ratinguser_id_rating4packerfo_maindb.post.user_id4Using where
    DEPENDENT SUBQUERYdark_postrating_countrefuser_id_ratinguser_id_rating4packerfo_maindb.post.user_id4Using where
  7. INSERT DELAYED INTO xf_thread_view
    	(thread_id)
    VALUES
    	(?)
    Params: 39156
    Run Time: 0.000261
  8. UPDATE xf_thread SET hot_count = hot_count + 1 WHERE thread_id = 39156
    Run Time: 0.002503
  9. SELECT thread.*
    	,
    		0 AS thread_reply_banned
    FROM xf_thread AS thread
    
    WHERE thread.thread_id = ?
    Params: 39156
    Run Time: 0.000464
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    SIMPLEthreadconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
  10. SELECT node.*, forum.*
    	,
    	permission.cache_value AS node_permission_cache
    FROM xf_forum AS forum
    INNER JOIN xf_node AS node ON (node.node_id = forum.node_id)
    
    	LEFT JOIN xf_permission_cache_content AS permission
    		ON (permission.permission_combination_id = 1
    			AND permission.content_type = 'node'
    			AND permission.content_id = forum.node_id)
    WHERE node.node_id = ?
    Params: 20
    Run Time: 0.000360
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    SIMPLEforumconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
    SIMPLEnodeconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
    SIMPLEpermissionconstPRIMARYPRIMARY35const,const,const1 
  11. SELECT *
    FROM xf_ignore_thread
    WHERE user_id = ?
    	AND thread_id = ?
    Params: 0, 39156
    Run Time: 0.000179
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    SIMPLExf_ignore_threadrefuser_threaduser_thread8const,const1 
  12. SELECT EWRporta2_articles.*, xf_thread.*, xf_post.*, xf_user.*, EWRporta2_authors.*
    FROM EWRporta2_articles
    	INNER JOIN xf_thread ON (xf_thread.thread_id = EWRporta2_articles.thread_id)
    	INNER JOIN xf_post ON (xf_post.post_id = xf_thread.first_post_id)
    	LEFT JOIN xf_user ON (xf_user.user_id = xf_thread.user_id)
    	LEFT JOIN EWRporta2_authors ON (EWRporta2_authors.user_id = xf_thread.user_id)
    WHERE EWRporta2_articles.thread_id = ?
    Params: 39156
    Run Time: 0.001321
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    SIMPLE       Impossible WHERE noticed after reading const tables
  13. SELECT EWRporta2_articles.*, EWRporta2_authors.*, xf_thread.*, xf_post.*, xf_user.*
    FROM xf_thread
    	INNER JOIN xf_post ON (xf_post.post_id = xf_thread.first_post_id)
    	LEFT JOIN xf_user ON (xf_user.user_id = xf_thread.user_id)
    	LEFT JOIN EWRporta2_authors ON (EWRporta2_authors.user_id = xf_thread.user_id)
    	LEFT JOIN EWRporta2_articles ON (EWRporta2_articles.thread_id = xf_thread.thread_id)
    WHERE xf_thread.thread_id = ?
    Params: 39156
    Run Time: 0.001023
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    SIMPLExf_threadconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
    SIMPLExf_postconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
    SIMPLExf_userconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
    SIMPLEEWRporta2_authorsconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const0unique row not found
    SIMPLEEWRporta2_articlesconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const0unique row not found
  14. INSERT INTO xf_session_activity
    	(user_id, unique_key, ip, controller_name, controller_action, view_state, params, view_date, robot_key)
    VALUES
    	(?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
    	ip = VALUES(ip),
    	controller_name = VALUES(controller_name),
    	controller_action = VALUES(controller_action),
    	view_state = VALUES(view_state),
    	params = VALUES(params),
    	view_date = VALUES(view_date),
    	robot_key = VALUES(robot_key)
    Params: 0, , , XenForo_ControllerPublic_Thread, Index, valid, thread_id=39156&page=3, 1472055107,
    Run Time: 0.002001
  15. SELECT title, phrase_text
    FROM xf_phrase_compiled
    WHERE language_id = ?
    	AND title IN ('freepro_menu_tickets', 'freepro_menu_schedule', 'freepro_menu_roster', 'freepro_menu_draft')
    Params: 1
    Run Time: 0.000165
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    SIMPLExf_phrase_compiledrangePRIMARYPRIMARY106 4Using where
  16. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 464661, a:1:{i:0;s:345:"Hi, just wanted to introduce myself. Packers are one of my picks for this week and wanted to say hello. I am not here to do anything more than take the greatest game and make it more interesting (if that is possible) with a smile. Good luck and let's have a great season! ; ) youtube.com/watch?v=JUtyfKEEPfM&feature=share&list=ULJUtyfKEEPfM";}, 1470665447, 1472055107
    Run Time: 0.001125
  17. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 464696, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:31:"Jen, post: 464661, member: 7106";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:41:"[quote="Jen, post: 464661, member: 7106"]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:342:"Hi, just wanted to introduce myself. Packers are one of my picks for this week and wanted to say hello. I am not here to do anything more than take the greatest game and make it more interesting (if that is possible) with a smile. Good luck and let's have a great season! ; ) youtube.com/watch?v=JUtyfKEEPfM&feature=share&list=ULJUtyfKEEPfM";}}i:1;s:36:" Good video, what did you say again?";}, 1470665447, 1472055107
    Run Time: 0.000852
  18. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 464697, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:38:"HansGruber, post: 464641, member: 7105";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:48:"[quote="HansGruber, post: 464641, member: 7105"]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:3:{i:0;s:338:"Pretty darn hilarious (in an ironic sense) to see Packers fans saying Seattle fans underrate Packers DBs, then listen to Packer fans talk about our secondary giving up tons of yards/TDs. That's just too rich. You all have severely misjudged our secondary, they're called the Legion of Boom for a reason. Real big dudes that like to hit ";i:1;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:1:"b";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:3:"[B]";i:1;s:4:"[/B]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:6:"really";}}i:2;s:2212:" hard on every play, jamming guys at the line, disrupting routes, getting multiple INTs and turnovers every game, and just playing classic smash-mouth football out there. You can't compare us to the 49ers, our secondary is hands-down another step up from them. You haven't experienced anything like it yet. You probably didn't see what happened to Dallas unless you were at the game, since the TV cameras didn't show it. All those ignorant analysts talking about Dallas dropping the ball and imploding, because they didn't watch the game. They didn't see the Cowboys getting beat up on every down. There's a reason their receivers were all dropping passes, looking upfield before they caught the ball and cowering like girl scouts in a prison yard. Almost every play, our DBs were hitting fools really hard. Anyone who crossed the middle got smacked, whether it was before or after the whistle didn't matter. Seattle DBs were hitting receivers that weren't even targets on the play, bad-*** hard hits that you could hear in the stands. CRACK!! There goes Witten again. Witten got hit so hard and so often, he completely dropped out of the game by the second quarter. Ogletree got clocked a couple times really good, once when he was out-of-bounds, and he started dropping passes too. Dez Bryant was totally off his game because we got in his head too, same thing - when he wasn't dropping passes, he was out there pissed off and trying to throw punches because guys were taking HUGE shots on him almost every down, whether he had the ball or not. Thank god for the scab replacement refs or we would have had a whole ton of penalties. Do you really honestly believe your receivers are that much tougher than the Dallas corps? You better hope so. Because if we do to Finley what we did to Witten, and we do to Jennings what we did to Bryant and Ogletree, Rodgers is gonna have a hard time finding reliable targets to throw to. Yeah, Rodgers is gonna put up some yards. But it's gonna come at a price. And just think, y'all still have to play the Cards. Welcome to the new NFC West - home of the most brutal physical defenses in the NFL. Good luck and hope your players find a way to escape the Clink healthy.";}}i:1;s:1776:" Hans, I love the Legion of Boom stuff. It's classic Stan Lee. How long have you fans been reading comic books? Who's Dr. Death? Who is the Silver Avenger on your team. I'll buy copies of these fine comic books in the making. I wish I had the idea first. Comic books NFL teams. Novel idea. Sometimes fantasy is all ya got right Hans? If I didn't know better I'd think Seattle is trying to become the Detroit Lions West. "Let's just hit and injure other players, we're obviously not good enough to compete" I get it, after years of futility Detroit decided they'd just gather a bunch of goons and wanna-be gangsters to injure professional athletes. The sad part of it all is that some fans haven't seen enough success for their franchise. They start to like that kind of football. It's like watching racing to see an accident. No appreciation for the finer points of the sport. You look for victory in bloody noses and injuring opposing players. Sad. Funny you mention turnovers too. The Packers secondary was best in the league in interceptions last year. I think that bodes well for your rookie QB and bad for our NFL MVP QB. It sounds like the Packers are going to be handed their backsides by your amazing secondary. You compared your team to the 39ers. Does your team have a pass rush like theirs? Outstanding LB play? I'm just wondering because you only talk about your secondary. Amazing you're proud of your team in it's win and still admit your team cheated and got away with it because of the refs. Let me ask you one question Hans - is your team any good when they don't cheat? And last item - yes, I think the Packers receiving corps is far and away tougher than the Cowboys. You suggest I better hope so. You think hope will protect them from the "Legions of Boom?";}, 1470665447, 1472055107
    Run Time: 0.000715
  19. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 464698, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:31:"Jen, post: 464661, member: 7106";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:41:"[quote="Jen, post: 464661, member: 7106"]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:342:"Hi, just wanted to introduce myself. Packers are one of my picks for this week and wanted to say hello. I am not here to do anything more than take the greatest game and make it more interesting (if that is possible) with a smile. Good luck and let's have a great season! ; ) youtube.com/watch?v=JUtyfKEEPfM&feature=share&list=ULJUtyfKEEPfM";}}i:1;s:104:" Sorry, I was distracted. Chock full of insightful thoughts and game analysis. Well worth a closer look.";}, 1470665447, 1472055107
    Run Time: 0.000815
  20. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 464721, a:2:{i:0;s:90:"Do you really honestly believe your receivers are that much tougher than the Dallas corps ";i:1;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"color";s:6:"option";s:7:"#008000";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:15:"[COLOR=#008000]";i:1;s:8:"[/COLOR]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:1:"b";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:3:"[B]";i:1;s:4:"[/B]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:526:"Well..Yeah..The numbers speak for themselves. Even in the loss to the 9ers they put up 303 yards in the air. Dallas has not had the same corps for the last 4 years. Their offense is more vertical. Ours is a west coast offense predicated on the run after the catch. If Rodgers has 4 of them on the field and you cannot get to him it is unlikely that he is going to miss. And if you can get to him he can still run the field pretty well. When the only QB to outrush you is Michael Vick I'd say that is another weapon in itself.";}}}}}, 1470665447, 1472055107
    Run Time: 0.001057
  21. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 464731, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:38:"HansGruber, post: 464641, member: 7105";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:48:"[quote="HansGruber, post: 464641, member: 7105"]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:3:{i:0;s:338:"Pretty darn hilarious (in an ironic sense) to see Packers fans saying Seattle fans underrate Packers DBs, then listen to Packer fans talk about our secondary giving up tons of yards/TDs. That's just too rich. You all have severely misjudged our secondary, they're called the Legion of Boom for a reason. Real big dudes that like to hit ";i:1;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:1:"b";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:3:"[B]";i:1;s:4:"[/B]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:6:"really";}}i:2;s:2212:" hard on every play, jamming guys at the line, disrupting routes, getting multiple INTs and turnovers every game, and just playing classic smash-mouth football out there. You can't compare us to the 49ers, our secondary is hands-down another step up from them. You haven't experienced anything like it yet. You probably didn't see what happened to Dallas unless you were at the game, since the TV cameras didn't show it. All those ignorant analysts talking about Dallas dropping the ball and imploding, because they didn't watch the game. They didn't see the Cowboys getting beat up on every down. There's a reason their receivers were all dropping passes, looking upfield before they caught the ball and cowering like girl scouts in a prison yard. Almost every play, our DBs were hitting fools really hard. Anyone who crossed the middle got smacked, whether it was before or after the whistle didn't matter. Seattle DBs were hitting receivers that weren't even targets on the play, bad-*** hard hits that you could hear in the stands. CRACK!! There goes Witten again. Witten got hit so hard and so often, he completely dropped out of the game by the second quarter. Ogletree got clocked a couple times really good, once when he was out-of-bounds, and he started dropping passes too. Dez Bryant was totally off his game because we got in his head too, same thing - when he wasn't dropping passes, he was out there pissed off and trying to throw punches because guys were taking HUGE shots on him almost every down, whether he had the ball or not. Thank god for the scab replacement refs or we would have had a whole ton of penalties. Do you really honestly believe your receivers are that much tougher than the Dallas corps? You better hope so. Because if we do to Finley what we did to Witten, and we do to Jennings what we did to Bryant and Ogletree, Rodgers is gonna have a hard time finding reliable targets to throw to. Yeah, Rodgers is gonna put up some yards. But it's gonna come at a price. And just think, y'all still have to play the Cards. Welcome to the new NFC West - home of the most brutal physical defenses in the NFL. Good luck and hope your players find a way to escape the Clink healthy.";}}i:1;s:456:" Your post certainly highlights some key match-ups in this game. SEA's DBs are a big, physical bunch, but not particularly fast with the exception of the FS. SEA likes to crowd the box, they play a lot of cover-1, and count on the DBs disrupting timing. The key match-up is SEA's pass rush vs. GB O-Line. Given time, history shows Rodgers slices and dices cover-1. I'd also be concerned that if you try to take Cobb's head off, you might just whiff.";}, 1470665447, 1472055107
    Run Time: 0.000858
  22. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 464733, a:1:{i:0;s:424:"Our DB's aren't very good but the Packers have twice as many INT's as Seattle and have given up almost 100 fewer passing yards a game? The Seattle DB's hit hard....o.k.....doesn't that mean they are hitting people after they have caught the ball? Bottom line is they will have plenty of opportunities to hit if Seattle doesn't do any better getting to Rodgers then they were the first two weeks being at the bottom in sacks.";}, 1470665447, 1472055107
    Run Time: 0.001135
  23. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 464746, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:34:"warhawk, post: 464733, member: 431";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:44:"[quote="warhawk, post: 464733, member: 431"]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:29:"Our DB's aren't very good....";}}i:1;s:101:" I donno about that. Once we got Bush and Jennings off the field they looked a heck of lot better.";}, 1470665447, 1472055107
    Run Time: 0.000902
  24. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 464771, a:1:{i:0;s:1984:"Hi, Seahawks fan here. I've always loved the Packers too. Back when Bart Starr was the QB. Here's my take on the game: DEFENSE: Hawks have an elite rushing defense so the Packers won't run successfully. Our pass rush hasn't generated sacks, but they've put enough pressure to disrupt the play. Rodgers will have some time, but he won't have all day. Our secondary is one of the leagues best. I don't look at yardage to judge a pass defense, I look at the opposing QB's QBrating. We're ranked 7th in the NFL in that category. Add to that our 12th man gives us an obvious advantage defensively and it would be unrealistic to expect GB to put up tons of points. But it would be unrealistic to expect Rodgers to be shut down either. So a score in the 20's would be a good bet. Now when I look at the Packers D I see that they have a monster pass rush and our pass pro isn't great. We also have a rookie QB. Your secondary is good enough because with that pass rush they don't have to be elite. GB has the 3rd best pass defense when looking at QBratings. GB won't stop Lynch, however. Your rush defense isn't that great and our rushing offense is our strong suit. For that reason, we can go to our run game to take the pressure off Wilson. We drove for 90 and 88 yards against Dallas in the second half. Mostly on the ground. When you have a rushing attack it takes away from the other teams ability to pass rush. When you don't have one, it allows the defense to do all sorts of things. GB won't have a rushing attack. Seattle will. What will that mean? I think it cancels out the advantage you have of Rodgers over a rookie QB. Seattle scoring in the 20's should also be a good bet. Who will win? Common sense says the Pack are the better team and have a huge advantage in their pass rush vs a rookie QB. But our special teams have been awesome so far and it's a home game with the 12th man giving our D a huge advantage. So all things considered, I'm saying OT hawks win, 23-20.";}, 1470665447, 1472055107
    Run Time: 0.001084
  25. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 464774, a:1:{i:0;s:205:"Stopping Lynch and protecting the football are absolutely necessary. Otherwise, the Seahawks will chew up the clock and be playing with a short field. We don't want that. We depend on numerous possessions.";}, 1470665447, 1472055107
    Run Time: 0.000993
  26. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 464777, a:1:{i:0;s:50:"Should be a good game tomorrow night. Cannot wait!";}, 1470665447, 1472055107
    Run Time: 0.000938
  27. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 464819, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:31:"Pen, post: 464771, member: 7110";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:41:"[quote="Pen, post: 464771, member: 7110"]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:1984:"Hi, Seahawks fan here. I've always loved the Packers too. Back when Bart Starr was the QB. Here's my take on the game: DEFENSE: Hawks have an elite rushing defense so the Packers won't run successfully. Our pass rush hasn't generated sacks, but they've put enough pressure to disrupt the play. Rodgers will have some time, but he won't have all day. Our secondary is one of the leagues best. I don't look at yardage to judge a pass defense, I look at the opposing QB's QBrating. We're ranked 7th in the NFL in that category. Add to that our 12th man gives us an obvious advantage defensively and it would be unrealistic to expect GB to put up tons of points. But it would be unrealistic to expect Rodgers to be shut down either. So a score in the 20's would be a good bet. Now when I look at the Packers D I see that they have a monster pass rush and our pass pro isn't great. We also have a rookie QB. Your secondary is good enough because with that pass rush they don't have to be elite. GB has the 3rd best pass defense when looking at QBratings. GB won't stop Lynch, however. Your rush defense isn't that great and our rushing offense is our strong suit. For that reason, we can go to our run game to take the pressure off Wilson. We drove for 90 and 88 yards against Dallas in the second half. Mostly on the ground. When you have a rushing attack it takes away from the other teams ability to pass rush. When you don't have one, it allows the defense to do all sorts of things. GB won't have a rushing attack. Seattle will. What will that mean? I think it cancels out the advantage you have of Rodgers over a rookie QB. Seattle scoring in the 20's should also be a good bet. Who will win? Common sense says the Pack are the better team and have a huge advantage in their pass rush vs a rookie QB. But our special teams have been awesome so far and it's a home game with the 12th man giving our D a huge advantage. So all things considered, I'm saying OT hawks win, 23-20.";}}i:1;s:1543:" I'd say your analysis is on the mark in many ways. Our rush defense isn't great, but it's certainly better than last year. We didn't stop Frank Gore but we did much better against Chi's running game. Packer tackling was atrocious last year. This year it's much better. Enough to stop Lynch? Probably not. I fully expect Lynch to gain 100 yards on the ground. The question is whether that will be enough. Packers have been effective with a 4-man rush and haven't had to blitz much to get pressure on the opposing QB. On the other hand, if Seattle has to blitz in order to get pressure on Rodgers, they'll be in trouble. Any great secondary is only so good when a great QB has time. Rodgers and co. have faced 2 defenses that have good pass rushes--SF and Chi--and Rodgers has been sacked a lot so far. The OL has been shaky so far, but in the 2nd half against the Bears they protected Rodgers much better and actually did some decent run-blocking too. Packers showed that they can run the ball against Chi. If Seattle goes full-tilt to get to Rodgers, that could open up the running game. . . unless the Packers are playing catch-up. The way I see it, the Packers had better show up to play tonight or they'll be 1-2, but if Rodgers has more time and the offense starts to click, which they haven't so far, then the Packers should come out with a victory. Still, Seattle is a good up-and-coming team, and if Wilson has a good rookie season and gets a year under his belt, then hey, they could be real contenders for the next few years.";}, 1470665447, 1472055107
    Run Time: 0.001192
  28. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 464823, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:38:"HansGruber, post: 464641, member: 7105";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:48:"[quote="HansGruber, post: 464641, member: 7105"]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:3:{i:0;s:338:"Pretty darn hilarious (in an ironic sense) to see Packers fans saying Seattle fans underrate Packers DBs, then listen to Packer fans talk about our secondary giving up tons of yards/TDs. That's just too rich. You all have severely misjudged our secondary, they're called the Legion of Boom for a reason. Real big dudes that like to hit ";i:1;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:1:"b";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:3:"[B]";i:1;s:4:"[/B]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:6:"really";}}i:2;s:2212:" hard on every play, jamming guys at the line, disrupting routes, getting multiple INTs and turnovers every game, and just playing classic smash-mouth football out there. You can't compare us to the 49ers, our secondary is hands-down another step up from them. You haven't experienced anything like it yet. You probably didn't see what happened to Dallas unless you were at the game, since the TV cameras didn't show it. All those ignorant analysts talking about Dallas dropping the ball and imploding, because they didn't watch the game. They didn't see the Cowboys getting beat up on every down. There's a reason their receivers were all dropping passes, looking upfield before they caught the ball and cowering like girl scouts in a prison yard. Almost every play, our DBs were hitting fools really hard. Anyone who crossed the middle got smacked, whether it was before or after the whistle didn't matter. Seattle DBs were hitting receivers that weren't even targets on the play, bad-*** hard hits that you could hear in the stands. CRACK!! There goes Witten again. Witten got hit so hard and so often, he completely dropped out of the game by the second quarter. Ogletree got clocked a couple times really good, once when he was out-of-bounds, and he started dropping passes too. Dez Bryant was totally off his game because we got in his head too, same thing - when he wasn't dropping passes, he was out there pissed off and trying to throw punches because guys were taking HUGE shots on him almost every down, whether he had the ball or not. Thank god for the scab replacement refs or we would have had a whole ton of penalties. Do you really honestly believe your receivers are that much tougher than the Dallas corps? You better hope so. Because if we do to Finley what we did to Witten, and we do to Jennings what we did to Bryant and Ogletree, Rodgers is gonna have a hard time finding reliable targets to throw to. Yeah, Rodgers is gonna put up some yards. But it's gonna come at a price. And just think, y'all still have to play the Cards. Welcome to the new NFC West - home of the most brutal physical defenses in the NFL. Good luck and hope your players find a way to escape the Clink healthy.";}}i:1;s:39:" Get back on top of your pecil, TROLL";}, 1470665447, 1472055107
    Run Time: 0.001098
  29. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 464835, a:1:{i:0;s:34:"Any word on Jennings for the game?";}, 1470665447, 1472055107
    Run Time: 0.001537
  30. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 464844, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:33:"Croak, post: 464835, member: 2367";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:43:"[quote="Croak, post: 464835, member: 2367"]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:34:"Any word on Jennings for the game?";}}i:1;s:129:" I've heard multiple times he was going to suit up on NFL Network. He says he might not be 100% but he's going to give it a go.";}, 1470665447, 1472055107
    Run Time: 0.001675
  31. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 464850, a:1:{i:0;s:567:"If jennings does play, and he should (according to NFL network) that will force SEA to double team him. I doubt that they think that can play him on man coverage....bring that legion of boom crap on man coverage and jennings and Nelson will light you up. I do think that Arod will have some time in the pocket, given that their pass rush is a joke. Their starting LT just came off injury to his right knee and is going up against CM3....good luck with that. I think the only factor will be stopping lynch EARLY to hush that crowd. If we do that we are gold for a win.";}, 1470665447, 1472055107
    Run Time: 0.000987
  32. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 464861, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:31:"Pen, post: 464771, member: 7110";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:41:"[quote="Pen, post: 464771, member: 7110"]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:1984:"Hi, Seahawks fan here. I've always loved the Packers too. Back when Bart Starr was the QB. Here's my take on the game: DEFENSE: Hawks have an elite rushing defense so the Packers won't run successfully. Our pass rush hasn't generated sacks, but they've put enough pressure to disrupt the play. Rodgers will have some time, but he won't have all day. Our secondary is one of the leagues best. I don't look at yardage to judge a pass defense, I look at the opposing QB's QBrating. We're ranked 7th in the NFL in that category. Add to that our 12th man gives us an obvious advantage defensively and it would be unrealistic to expect GB to put up tons of points. But it would be unrealistic to expect Rodgers to be shut down either. So a score in the 20's would be a good bet. Now when I look at the Packers D I see that they have a monster pass rush and our pass pro isn't great. We also have a rookie QB. Your secondary is good enough because with that pass rush they don't have to be elite. GB has the 3rd best pass defense when looking at QBratings. GB won't stop Lynch, however. Your rush defense isn't that great and our rushing offense is our strong suit. For that reason, we can go to our run game to take the pressure off Wilson. We drove for 90 and 88 yards against Dallas in the second half. Mostly on the ground. When you have a rushing attack it takes away from the other teams ability to pass rush. When you don't have one, it allows the defense to do all sorts of things. GB won't have a rushing attack. Seattle will. What will that mean? I think it cancels out the advantage you have of Rodgers over a rookie QB. Seattle scoring in the 20's should also be a good bet. Who will win? Common sense says the Pack are the better team and have a huge advantage in their pass rush vs a rookie QB. But our special teams have been awesome so far and it's a home game with the 12th man giving our D a huge advantage. So all things considered, I'm saying OT hawks win, 23-20.";}}i:1;s:414:" Pretty sure of yourself..............Pack wont, Pack can't..Seattle will Lesson? Say Seattle should and Packers might not be able to Because IF OR WHEN Packers can and do run and Seattle cant stop our passing attack, or stopping our run, your going to look foolish I am pretty sure a Seattle loss, you wont be back...A Seattle win and you will be back.. But take my advice for the NEXT forum you visit";}, 1470665447, 1472055107
    Run Time: 0.000810
  33. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 464862, a:1:{i:0;s:396:"I have never trolled an opposing teams forum before a game. I have visited as guest, but never posted. I think that since we have had trolls from the 49ers, bears and now seattle.....that have shown signs of being true classless trolls....the packers have the most class as a team and as fans. I know I spout off at the mouth on here, but only after provocation. These troll fans seem dilusional.";}, 1470665447, 1472055107
    Run Time: 0.000813
  34. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 464863, a:1:{i:0;s:273:"The Packers are the better team but lets not underestimate the Seahawks, I can see them giving us a problem. Our D got decent pressure on the Bears and we were able to generate a running game, but the Seahawks aren't the same. Oh and MATT FLYNN!!!! Did I say MATT FLYNN!!!!";}, 1470665447, 1472055107
    Run Time: 0.000806
  35. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 464870, a:1:{i:0;s:27:"Did someone say Matt Flynn?";}, 1470665447, 1472055107
    Run Time: 0.000778
  36. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 464905, a:1:{i:0;s:124:"With all the Packer fans that will be there I think they are only going to have 11 1/2 men. Stop Lynch and the game is ours.";}, 1470665447, 1472055107
    Run Time: 0.000770
  37. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 464916, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:41:"HardRightEdge, post: 464746, member: 6804";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:51:"[quote="HardRightEdge, post: 464746, member: 6804"]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:97:"I donno about that. Once we got Bush and Jennings off the field they looked a heck of lot better.";}}i:1;s:220:" I was responding to the Seattle Fans post that suggested we don't have good DB's and was pointing out we have twice the INT's they do. I maybe should have preferenced it saying "You say we don't have good DB's but".....";}, 1470665447, 1472055107
    Run Time: 0.000963
  38. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 464939, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:34:"warhawk, post: 464916, member: 431";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:44:"[quote="warhawk, post: 464916, member: 431"]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:219:"I was responding to the Seattle Fans post that suggested we don't have good DB's and was pointing out we have twice the INT's they do. I maybe should have preferenced it saying "You say we don't have good DB's but".....";}}i:1;s:93:" I see. In that case it turned out to be inadvertent dry humor on my part, so it's all good.";}, 1470665447, 1472055107
    Run Time: 0.001006
  39. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 464940, a:1:{i:0;s:93:"I think it's funny that Seattle fan said DALLAS' receivers are on a par with ours. :roflmao:";}, 1470665447, 1472055107
    Run Time: 0.000790
  40. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 464985, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:3:"img";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:5:"[IMG]";i:1;s:6:"[/IMG]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:57:"http://media.screened.com/uploads/0/1144/275355-tsung.jpg";}}i:1;s:31:" Let the horible calls...begin!";}, 1470665447, 1472055107
    Run Time: 0.000906

Included Files (154, XenForo Classes: 63)

  1. index.php
  2. library/XenForo/Autoloader.php
  3. library/XenForo/Application.php
  4. library/Zend/Registry.php
  5. library/Lgpl/utf8.php
  6. library/Zend/Config.php
  7. library/config.php
  8. library/XenForo/FrontController.php
  9. library/XenForo/Dependencies/Public.php
  10. library/XenForo/Dependencies/Abstract.php
  11. library/Zend/Controller/Request/Http.php
  12. library/Zend/Controller/Request/Abstract.php
  13. library/Zend/Uri.php
  14. library/Zend/Controller/Response/Http.php
  15. library/Zend/Controller/Response/Abstract.php
  16. library/XenForo/Model/DataRegistry.php
  17. library/XenForo/Model.php
  18. library/Zend/Cache.php
  19. library/Zend/Cache/Backend/Memcached.php
  20. library/Zend/Cache/Backend/ExtendedInterface.php
  21. library/Zend/Cache/Backend/Interface.php
  22. library/Zend/Cache/Backend.php
  23. library/Zend/Cache/Core.php
  24. library/XenForo/CodeEvent.php
  25. library/XenForo/Options.php
  26. library/XenForo/Link.php
  27. library/XenForo/Template/Helper/Core.php
  28. library/FreePro/Listener.php
  29. library/bdTagMe/Listener.php
  30. library/bdTagMe/Helper/Template.php
  31. library/bdTagMe/ShippableHelper/Updater.php
  32. library/bdTagMe/Option.php
  33. library/sonnb/XenGallery/Listener.php
  34. library/EWRporta2/Listener/Init.php
  35. library/XenForo/Router.php
  36. library/XenForo/Route/Filter.php
  37. library/XenForo/Route/Interface.php
  38. library/XenForo/Route/ResponseSuffix.php
  39. library/XenForo/Route/Prefix.php
  40. library/XenForo/Route/Prefix/Threads.php
  41. library/XenForo/RouteMatch.php
  42. library/XenForo/ControllerPublic/Thread.php
  43. library/XenForo/ControllerPublic/Abstract.php
  44. library/XenForo/Controller.php
  45. library/ModerateCountry/RegisterListener.php
  46. library/EWRporta2/Widget/Listener/ArticlesMain.php
  47. library/Nobita/IgnoreThread/Listener.php
  48. library/Dark/PostRating/EventListener.php
  49. library/EWRporta2/Listener/Controller.php
  50. library/FreePro/XenForo/ControllerPublic/Thread.php
  51. library/Nobita/IgnoreThread/ControllerPublic/Thread.php
  52. library/sonnb/XenGallery/XenForo/ControllerPublic/Thread.php
  53. library/EWRporta2/ControllerPublic/Thread.php
  54. library/XenForo/Input.php
  55. library/XenForo/Session.php
  56. library/Zend/Db.php
  57. library/Zend/Db/Adapter/Mysqli.php
  58. library/Zend/Db/Adapter/Abstract.php
  59. library/Zend/Db/Select.php
  60. library/Zend/Db/Expr.php
  61. library/Zend/Db/Profiler.php
  62. library/Zend/Db/Statement/Mysqli.php
  63. library/Zend/Db/Statement.php
  64. library/Zend/Db/Statement/Interface.php
  65. library/XenForo/Helper/Ip.php
  66. library/XenForo/Visitor.php
  67. library/XenForo/Model/User.php
  68. library/ThemeHouse/JoinUserGroup/Listener/LoadClass.php
  69. library/ThemeHouse/Listener/LoadClass.php
  70. library/ThemeHouse/Listener/LoadClass/20150518.php
  71. library/Dark/TaigaChat/EventListener/Listener.php
  72. library/sonnbThreadMassActions/Listener.php
  73. library/EWRporta2/Listener/Model.php
  74. library/ThemeHouse/JoinUserGroup/Extend/XenForo/Model/User.php
  75. library/Dark/PostRating/Model/User.php
  76. library/bdTagMe/XenForo/Model/User.php
  77. library/sonnb/XenGallery/XenForo/Model/User.php
  78. library/EWRporta2/Model/User.php
  79. library/Zend/Db/Profiler/Query.php
  80. library/XenForo/Permission.php
  81. library/XenForo/Helper/Php.php
  82. library/XenForo/Phrase.php
  83. library/XenForo/Locale.php
  84. library/Sedo/DetectBrowser/Listener/Visitor.php
  85. library/Sedo/DetectBrowser/Helper/MobileDetect.php
  86. library/EWRporta2/Model/Perms.php
  87. library/ThemeHouse/JoinUserGroup/Listener/ControllerPreDispatch.php
  88. library/ThemeHouse/Listener/ControllerPreDispatch.php
  89. library/ThemeHouse/Listener/ControllerPreDispatch/20150911.php
  90. library/UnreadPostCount/Listener.php
  91. library/XenForo/ControllerHelper/ForumThreadPost.php
  92. library/XenForo/ControllerHelper/Abstract.php
  93. library/XenForo/Model/Thread.php
  94. library/Nobita/IgnoreThread/Model/Thread.php
  95. library/Dark/PostRating/Model/Thread.php
  96. library/sonnbThreadMassActions/Model/Thread.php
  97. library/UnreadPostCount/Model/Thread.php
  98. library/Dark/PostRating/Model.php
  99. library/XenForo/Model/Forum.php
  100. library/XenForo/Helper/String.php
  101. library/XenForo/Helper/Discussion.php
  102. library/XenForo/Model/Post.php
  103. library/Dark/PostRating/Model/Post.php
  104. library/sonnbThreadMassActions/Model/Post.php
  105. library/EWRporta2/Model/Post.php
  106. library/EWRporta2/Model/Articles.php
  107. library/XenForo/Model/Attachment.php
  108. library/XenForo/Model/Node.php
  109. library/Nobita/IgnoreThread/Model/Node.php
  110. library/XenForo/Route/Prefix/Categories.php
  111. library/XenForo/Route/Prefix/Forums.php
  112. library/XenForo/ControllerResponse/View.php
  113. library/XenForo/ControllerResponse/Abstract.php
  114. library/Nobita/IgnoreThread/Model/IgnoreThread.php
  115. library/XenForo/Helper/Cookie.php
  116. library/XenForo/ViewRenderer/HtmlPublic.php
  117. library/XenForo/ViewRenderer/Abstract.php
  118. library/XenForo/Template/Public.php
  119. library/XenForo/Template/Abstract.php
  120. library/XenForo/ViewPublic/Thread/View.php
  121. library/XenForo/ViewPublic/Base.php
  122. library/XenForo/View.php
  123. library/EWRporta2/Listener/ViewPublic.php
  124. library/XenForo/BbCode/Parser.php
  125. library/XenForo/BbCode/Formatter/Base.php
  126. library/EWRporta2/Listener/BbCode.php
  127. library/bdTagMe/XenForo/BbCode/Formatter/Base.php
  128. library/sonnb/XenGallery/XenForo/BbCode/Formatter/Base.php
  129. library/EWRporta2/BbCode/Formatter.php
  130. library/XenForo/ViewPublic/Helper/Message.php
  131. library/XenForo/BbCode/TextWrapper.php
  132. library/WhoHasVisited/Listener.php
  133. library/XenForo/Route/Prefix/Members.php
  134. library/bdTagMe/XenForo/Route/Prefix/Members.php
  135. library/Dark/TaigaChat/EventListener/NavigationTabs.php
  136. library/EWRporta2/Listener/NavTabs.php
  137. library/XenForo/Template/FileHandler.php
  138. library/XenForo/Helper/File.php
  139. internal_data/templates/S.7,L.1,thread_view.php
  140. library/SeparateStickyAndNormal/Listener.php
  141. library/EWRporta2/Listener/Template.php
  142. internal_data/templates/S.7,L.1,ignore_thread_tool.php
  143. internal_data/templates/S.7,L.1,page_nav.php
  144. library/XenForo/Route/Prefix/Posts.php
  145. library/XenForo/Model/Avatar.php
  146. internal_data/templates/S.7,L.1,dark_postrating_message_user_info.php
  147. internal_data/templates/S.7,L.1,dark_postrating.php
  148. internal_data/templates/S.7,L.1,bb_code_tag_quote.php
  149. library/XenForo/Helper/Criteria.php
  150. library/XenForo/Debug.php
  151. internal_data/templates/S.7,L.1,PAGE_CONTAINER.php
  152. library/FreePro/Helper.php
  153. internal_data/templates/S.7,L.1,EWRporta2_Navtabs.php
  154. library/XenForo/ViewRenderer/Json.php