Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Official Lions studs and duds
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Daryl Muellenberg" data-source="post: 639131" data-attributes="member: 9708"><p>I realize that what may be obvious to one person may not to another. But I did qualify 'obvious' as indisputable visual evidence, which is what is used today to overturn a call, so rather than saying obvious I will use 'indisputable visual evidence' if that makes you feel better.</p><p></p><p>I didn't say the Fail Mary catch was obvious, did I? I said Tate pushing the defender down was obvious, and should have been a penalty. If offensive pass interference was reviewable then that would have been called. By not being able to review it, it cost the Packers the game.</p><p></p><p>Not sure why you bring up the Dez Bryant non catch. It was reviewed and they determined there was no indisputable evidence to change it (according to the rules, which I think they should change but is another topic of discussion). If a play doesn't have undisputable visual evidence to overturn it, then the play should stand as called, which is the way they call it today. Why is that so difficult to understand?</p><p></p><p>You are twisting my words about the speed. I didn't say speed doesn't matter for the replay, I said the speed they use to determine if a call is wrong shouldn't matter - in other words, if it is undisputable at regular speed or half speed or quarter speed then it should be undisputable no matter what speed they use to determine it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Daryl Muellenberg, post: 639131, member: 9708"] I realize that what may be obvious to one person may not to another. But I did qualify 'obvious' as indisputable visual evidence, which is what is used today to overturn a call, so rather than saying obvious I will use 'indisputable visual evidence' if that makes you feel better. I didn't say the Fail Mary catch was obvious, did I? I said Tate pushing the defender down was obvious, and should have been a penalty. If offensive pass interference was reviewable then that would have been called. By not being able to review it, it cost the Packers the game. Not sure why you bring up the Dez Bryant non catch. It was reviewed and they determined there was no indisputable evidence to change it (according to the rules, which I think they should change but is another topic of discussion). If a play doesn't have undisputable visual evidence to overturn it, then the play should stand as called, which is the way they call it today. Why is that so difficult to understand? You are twisting my words about the speed. I didn't say speed doesn't matter for the replay, I said the speed they use to determine if a call is wrong shouldn't matter - in other words, if it is undisputable at regular speed or half speed or quarter speed then it should be undisputable no matter what speed they use to determine it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Firethorn1001
ExpatPacker
Latest posts
Who Will Start?
Latest: Krabs
24 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 3:39 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Kentucky Derby Day!
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 1:47 AM
All Other Sports
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: El Guapo
Yesterday at 11:52 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 7:06 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Official Lions studs and duds
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top