Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Official Lions studs and duds
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ExpatPacker" data-source="post: 638627" data-attributes="member: 5535"><p>I'm getting sick already of the whining about the facemask. In real time it looks to all the world like a facemask, and even in slow motion looked at 1,000 times there's still enough there to justify the flag. Calling it a blatantly bad call is just ridiculous. It wasn't anywhere close to being blatant. Anytime a ref sees a hand to the face and the head being twisted around they're going to assume facemask. It was an iffy call, but it weren't no Fail Mary.</p><p></p><p>I also agree with the no-call on PI the play before. Detroit defender had his head turned and was making a play on the ball. Packer receiver had to come back for it and that's when there was contact. No foul was the correct call.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ExpatPacker, post: 638627, member: 5535"] I'm getting sick already of the whining about the facemask. In real time it looks to all the world like a facemask, and even in slow motion looked at 1,000 times there's still enough there to justify the flag. Calling it a blatantly bad call is just ridiculous. It wasn't anywhere close to being blatant. Anytime a ref sees a hand to the face and the head being twisted around they're going to assume facemask. It was an iffy call, but it weren't no Fail Mary. I also agree with the no-call on PI the play before. Detroit defender had his head turned and was making a play on the ball. Packer receiver had to come back for it and that's when there was contact. No foul was the correct call. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Schultz
kf323
shockerx
weeds
Latest posts
S
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: Schultz
A moment ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 WR room
Latest: OldSchool101
7 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: OldSchool101
17 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
17 minutes ago
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
M
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: mradtke66
56 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Official Lions studs and duds
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top