Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Fumblerooski" data-source="post: 189326" data-attributes="member: 966">I can understand about Woodson and KGB, but not about Favre. The Cowboys weren't letting him do anything and were consistently pressuring and hitting him. The game was 27-10 when Rodgers came in the game. I don't think missing Favre the rest of the way has anything to do with it.Now, I'm not saying that if Favre didn't get injured, he wouldn't have been able to lead the team back into it. But Rodgers seemed to calm GB down and was extremely effective. The way it was going, I don't think Favre would have put them over the top. In fact, the final score might have been slightly more lopsided than it ended up being...that again being based on what had transpired to that point.     If Favre hadn't played at all in the game, then okay, but he did and put up what I think was his worst QB rating (albeit not a full game).Just my two cents.</blockquote>

Total: 1,143 (members: 1, guests: 1,142)