Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Game Day Archive
Official Game Day Thread: Packers @ Buccaneers 11/8: LOSE 38 - 28
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Quientus" data-source="post: 256554" data-attributes="member: 1834"><p>There might be a larger picture than what apparently seems to be ...</p><p></p><p>Think about it for a moment ... - Not very long from now the salary cap will be lifted across the NFL and those franchises that are not economically sound will find themselves in trouble and with this opening up a whole new free agency market, as well as contract structuring, probably resulting in shorter contracts with larger pay off (to the players) ..., unfortunately it could open up the possibility of watching franchise implode, due to sheer economical instabilities, due to too heavy expenditures ...</p><p></p><p>As I understand it, those contracts already negotiated, will not be changed, meaning, that once the salary cap is lifted, those franchises with plenty of dollars to spend, will have much more "free reign" while they are still economical healthy, where as alot of those franchises who have already spent their money, will find themselves in a tougher spot, without the added channeling of funds from their respective owners ...</p><p></p><p>A similar problem persists in football (aka soccer), where you see alot of large Soccer Clubs, with huge debts, who are having to be bailed out by their respective governments, in order to avoid bankrupcy, because they are bent on spending huge amounts of money, chasing down success (mainly in the Champions League) ... And those soccer clubs that do not make the CL on a consistent basis, pay for this the very next season ...</p><p></p><p>Since the Packers is not a "One man owned" franchise, but a "public" company, the unwillingness to purchase (rather costly) free agents before the salary cap is lifted, could be explained ... - As the Packers do not have access to the "same funds" as other franchises have, and have to secure their company via other means ... Because as a public company the organisation has other responsibilities than your average NFL Franchise ...</p><p></p><p>I'm not saying that this is why, however, it does put the situation into a perspective ... - And could be another reason (not the sole reason) that the Board (Executive Board) are "meddling" more than they perhaps should with football operations ...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Quientus, post: 256554, member: 1834"] There might be a larger picture than what apparently seems to be ... Think about it for a moment ... - Not very long from now the salary cap will be lifted across the NFL and those franchises that are not economically sound will find themselves in trouble and with this opening up a whole new free agency market, as well as contract structuring, probably resulting in shorter contracts with larger pay off (to the players) ..., unfortunately it could open up the possibility of watching franchise implode, due to sheer economical instabilities, due to too heavy expenditures ... As I understand it, those contracts already negotiated, will not be changed, meaning, that once the salary cap is lifted, those franchises with plenty of dollars to spend, will have much more "free reign" while they are still economical healthy, where as alot of those franchises who have already spent their money, will find themselves in a tougher spot, without the added channeling of funds from their respective owners ... A similar problem persists in football (aka soccer), where you see alot of large Soccer Clubs, with huge debts, who are having to be bailed out by their respective governments, in order to avoid bankrupcy, because they are bent on spending huge amounts of money, chasing down success (mainly in the Champions League) ... And those soccer clubs that do not make the CL on a consistent basis, pay for this the very next season ... Since the Packers is not a "One man owned" franchise, but a "public" company, the unwillingness to purchase (rather costly) free agents before the salary cap is lifted, could be explained ... - As the Packers do not have access to the "same funds" as other franchises have, and have to secure their company via other means ... Because as a public company the organisation has other responsibilities than your average NFL Franchise ... I'm not saying that this is why, however, it does put the situation into a perspective ... - And could be another reason (not the sole reason) that the Board (Executive Board) are "meddling" more than they perhaps should with football operations ... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
DABIGZ
Magooch
mradtke66
Latest posts
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
41 minutes ago
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: mradtke66
41 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: CarryTheG14
Today at 9:27 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: Curly Calhoun
Today at 8:28 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 11:14 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Game Day Archive
Official Game Day Thread: Packers @ Buccaneers 11/8: LOSE 38 - 28
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top