Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ThePerfectBeard" data-source="post: 1062064" data-attributes="member: 2047"><p>Can someone please tell me why we decided to break the streak during one of the worst wide receiver draft classes rather than last year or prior stronger years? And why did we do it to draft a wide receiver that didn't break out until late, if we can even call it a break out and didn't even eclipse 1000 yards at any point? Did we turn into the Raiders and all of a sudden and get enamored with the 40 only? I feel like we just added another #2 to a wide receiver room with a slew of them, but I guess time will tell. Sorry, but I have to vent right now and I know most won't feel this way. Roast me now and later if I'm wrong.</p></blockquote><p></p>

No members online now.

Total: 665 (members: 1, guests: 664)