Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
OFFICIAL DEFENSIVE ISSUES THREAD
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BoltNut" data-source="post: 401053" data-attributes="member: 5596"><p>You guys could probably care less what I, a Charger fan, thinks about this game, but here goes. Sure, we basically gift wrapped that game for the Packers by spotting them 2 picks and a 14 point lead early. The Bolts were able to get back into this game late and make things interesting. Rivers is a very good QB that is having an awful year and no one seems to be able to put a finger on just why. The Bolts are a good team capable of putting up a lot of points on anyone, but have a tendency to shoot themselves in the foot.</p><p></p><p>Your QB, Rogers, is really efficient. There are no wasted moves or decisions that anyone could call bad ones. He, in my opinion was the reason for Green Bay's success. The coverage by San Diego was fairly good. The sacks on Rogers were coverage sacks, and only because he could not escape the pocket. The Packer O-line did a great job in protecting Rogers AND controlling the rush in a way that opened up room for Rogers to escape. The problem the Bolts have is that they cannot be consistent in their pass rush. The only thing they could do was try to use the rush in a manner that didn't allow Rogers to escape containment. We could not stop everyone, the Packers have far too many play-makers on offense to do that.</p><p></p><p>Granted, your defense gave up quite a few yards. Between the 20's EVERY team is giving up ridiculous yards. Your defense toughened up in the red zone and kept things in check. Vincent Jackson is an excellent receiver and is difficult to cover. Rivers is good at finding Jackson on deep routes, but he needs time in the pocket to do it. Bottom line, in my opinion anyway, was you had two very good teams playing a shoot-out style of game. The Packers had a better "gunslinger" calling the shots than we did, that day. I saw this as the only real difference.</p><p></p><p>Okay, I'm done. You may now fire at will. LOL</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BoltNut, post: 401053, member: 5596"] You guys could probably care less what I, a Charger fan, thinks about this game, but here goes. Sure, we basically gift wrapped that game for the Packers by spotting them 2 picks and a 14 point lead early. The Bolts were able to get back into this game late and make things interesting. Rivers is a very good QB that is having an awful year and no one seems to be able to put a finger on just why. The Bolts are a good team capable of putting up a lot of points on anyone, but have a tendency to shoot themselves in the foot. Your QB, Rogers, is really efficient. There are no wasted moves or decisions that anyone could call bad ones. He, in my opinion was the reason for Green Bay's success. The coverage by San Diego was fairly good. The sacks on Rogers were coverage sacks, and only because he could not escape the pocket. The Packer O-line did a great job in protecting Rogers AND controlling the rush in a way that opened up room for Rogers to escape. The problem the Bolts have is that they cannot be consistent in their pass rush. The only thing they could do was try to use the rush in a manner that didn't allow Rogers to escape containment. We could not stop everyone, the Packers have far too many play-makers on offense to do that. Granted, your defense gave up quite a few yards. Between the 20's EVERY team is giving up ridiculous yards. Your defense toughened up in the red zone and kept things in check. Vincent Jackson is an excellent receiver and is difficult to cover. Rivers is good at finding Jackson on deep routes, but he needs time in the pocket to do it. Bottom line, in my opinion anyway, was you had two very good teams playing a shoot-out style of game. The Packers had a better "gunslinger" calling the shots than we did, that day. I saw this as the only real difference. Okay, I'm done. You may now fire at will. LOL [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
gopkrs
Latest posts
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 12:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Poppa San
Today at 11:57 AM
Movies and Entertainment
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 11:08 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:07 AM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 8:43 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
OFFICIAL DEFENSIVE ISSUES THREAD
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
