*** Official Brandon Chillar VS Brady Poppinga ***

Krazygangsta

Cheesehead
Joined
Aug 28, 2006
Messages
583
Reaction score
0
Location
Montreal
Brady Poppinga
You must be logged in to see this image or video!


Height: 6 ft 3 in (1.91 m)
Weight: 245 lb (111 kg)
28 Years Old


Career Stats

Stats (2007) :

Total Tackles : 50
Solo Tackles : 43
Assists : 7
Sacks : 0
Pass Def : 1
Int : 1


VERSUS



Brandon Chillar

You must be logged in to see this image or video!


Height: 6 ft 3 in (1.91 m)
Weight: 242 lb (110 kg)
25 Years old


Career Stats


Stats (2007) :

Total Tackles : 65
Solo Tackles : 52
Assists : 13
Sacks : 2.5
Pass Def : 3
Int : 0

Stats / Career ... Shows Chillar is having a better career then Poppinga but it won't be a guarantee that he would get the spot just by his stats ... I'm a fan of both ... but i really think Chillar will be getting the roster spot ... how about you guys ?
 
OP
OP
K

Krazygangsta

Cheesehead
Joined
Aug 28, 2006
Messages
583
Reaction score
0
Location
Montreal
I like the fact that Chillar is still young 25 wow ... if he keeps up the way his playing he could just be the starter at GB for years to come
 

Mortfini

Cheesehead
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
457
Reaction score
0
Location
newcastle england
Chillar will win Cos he can do everything that brady does And cover a t.e The only bad mark on chillar Is he cant biltz as much as brady so it might be worth keeping both around



looks like i need a new sig
 

Packnic

Cheesehead
Joined
Mar 29, 2006
Messages
2,454
Reaction score
6
Location
Salisbury, NC
we are keeping both... and ive read several places that Chillar isnt an outstanding cover guy either. more side to side range than Brady. but not a cover guy.

Brady was better in coverage last year towards the end. and he is a blitzing LBer... so i think using both in their own specific way is the ticket.

may the best camper win.
 

porky88

Cheesehead
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
3,991
Reaction score
0
Location
Title Town
Poppinga will be used a lot on passing downs. He was a DE at BYU and can probably rush the passer better. Chillar will be used in short yardage run situations. As for who starts? My vote is Poppinga. I thought he improved a lot last year as the season went on.
 

packerfan1245

Cheesehead
Joined
Aug 28, 2006
Messages
721
Reaction score
0
Poppinga will be used a lot on passing downs. He was a DE at BYU and can probably rush the passer better. Chillar will be used in short yardage run situations. As for who starts? My vote is Poppinga. I thought he improved a lot last year as the season went on.


:agree:
 

BangTheDrum

Cheesehead
Joined
May 8, 2007
Messages
591
Reaction score
1
Location
Menomonie
Poppinga will be used a lot on passing downs. He was a DE at BYU and can probably rush the passer better. Chillar will be used in short yardage run situations. As for who starts? My vote is Poppinga. I thought he improved a lot last year as the season went on.

Cool, maybe he can muster up at least a half a sack next year!
My vote was Chillar... but I'm a known Poppinga ouster
 

tromadz

Cheesehead
Joined
Aug 16, 2005
Messages
999
Reaction score
3
Location
Chicago
I dont know much about Chillar, but I'd say Poppinga, cuz he's consistently improved(growth from within, *****es) and cuz I like to say "Swarmin Mormon!"
 

Greg C.

Cheesehead
Joined
Jun 1, 2005
Messages
2,856
Reaction score
0
Location
Marquette, Michigan
From what I've read, it sounds like Chillar is better, so I'd say he is more likely to start. They can fight it out in training camp, though. I am intrigued by the reports that Chillar is a better cover guy than Poppinga AND he had 2.5 sacks last year.

Poppinga is good at the line of scrimmage, but he seems to lose his playmaking abilities farther downfield.

What I like best about the Chillar signing is how it upgrades our LB depth.
 

gopackgo

Cheesehead
Joined
Sep 13, 2006
Messages
730
Reaction score
0
Am I just imagining things when someone mentioned the Packers might move to a 3-4 with Harrell playing the nose?

Despite living near St. Louis, I don't know much of this guy, but he looks to be decent. Combine that he's young, and will get to play with Barnett and Hawk, hopefully he even can get better. Looking at Rams boards, they're not happy he's gone.
 

Greg C.

Cheesehead
Joined
Jun 1, 2005
Messages
2,856
Reaction score
0
Location
Marquette, Michigan
Am I just imagining things when someone mentioned the Packers might move to a 3-4 with Harrell playing the nose?

Either you are just imagining things, or somebody else is. Somebody here would've heard about that by now. Our DC is strictly a 4-3 guy. If Harrell plays the nose, where would that leave Ryan Pickett? I just don't see our personnel fitting that system at all.
 

Zombieslayer

Cheesehead
Joined
Aug 13, 2006
Messages
4,338
Reaction score
0
Location
CA
Does this mean poppinga could be used as a DE to rest kampman

That's what I heard. Brady will be an OLB and situational DE.

Kampman, as awesome as he is, simply took too many snaps last season. I'd love to see him rested more so he could do more damage to opposing Os.
 

Members online

Latest posts

Top