Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="TOPHAT" data-source="post: 147172" data-attributes="member: 781">DRAFT REVIEW<a href="http://sports.aol.com/nfl/story/_a/browns-raiders-are-drafts-big-winners/20070429193709990001" target="_blank">http://sports.aol.com/nfl/story/_a/browns-raiders-are-drafts-big-winners/20070429193709990001</a>D isn't for draft  AOL's Ira Winderman passes out his grades for this weekend's NFL draft and hands the Packers a D.Winderman writes: "Top pick Justin Harrell is better against the run than the pass, and that's important for the Packers because of their competition with Chicago in the NFC North. But Harrell had a major injury to his biceps last year and, as much as the Packers need to upgrade on defense, they might have been better served finding a weapon to help Brett Favre before it's too late. It's hard to understand the second-round move, when the Packers passed over a durable runner like Tony Hunt, who'd be a perfect fit for their offense and their climate, and instead chose Brandon Jackson who, among other things, has a history of shoulder problems."There's even a drag-and-drop in the story in which you can rank the five worst drafts. You don't have the choice of every NFL team, but Winderman's five worst grades: Packers, Dolphins, Titans, Vikings and Redskins.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 77 (members: 1, guests: 76)