1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

    You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
  2. Announcement is LIVE: Read the Forum Post

offensive players to get radios in helemts??

Discussion in 'All Other Team Discussions' started by longtimefan, Jan 22, 2007.

  1. longtimefan

    longtimefan Super Moderator Staff Member Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Messages:
    16,672
    Ratings:
    +2,971
    NFL | Offensive players to have radio receivers in helmets?
    Sun, 21 Jan 2007 08:59:04 -0800

    Mark Gillispie, of the Cleveland Plain Dealer, reports the National Football League is developing plans to put radio receivers in the helmets of all offensive players, which would enable them to hear the quarterback's signals and line calls. The system is scheduled for testing during the 2008 NFL Europa season. At that point, the league's competition committee will decide whether to implement it in the NFL.
     
  2. jdlax

    jdlax Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2004
    Messages:
    818
    Ratings:
    +0
    When I first heard about this idea I immediately pictured QBs telling WRs exactly when to make their cut, what way to go, ect., and thought it was a bad idea. Then I realized that they can shut the network or whatever down after each snap, so I don't mind the idea now. Some people will complain that it takes away the crowds ability to cause false starts, but personally I wouldn't miss that.
     
  3. cheesey

    cheesey Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2005
    Messages:
    1,000
    Ratings:
    +3
    I can see it now...........huge speakers on the sides of helmets, with rap music blaring! Spinning "Nike" logos on their shoes! :rotflmao:
     
  4. Ryan

    Ryan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2004
    Messages:
    3,371
    Ratings:
    +1
    I will complain about that, that's a huge benefit to playing at home. You have your back to the endzone and your fans help you out by screaming their hearts out. All part of the environment.

    As of now, I don't like the idea, but that could always change I suppose.
     
  5. bavpb

    bavpb Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2005
    Messages:
    599
    Ratings:
    +0
    Here's a speaker with a helmet on..... [​IMG]

    .....wait a minute.....you said helmets with speakers on, didn't you?.......never mind :rotflmao:
     
  6. Zero2Cool

    Zero2Cool I own a website

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    11,903
    Ratings:
    +8
    So much for the "12th man".
     
  7. pack_in_black

    pack_in_black Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,876
    Ratings:
    +0
    Screw the NFL and their 'competition commitee'. Stupid rules like roughing the passer, 'blow to the quarterback's head', and other crappy ideas like this are what's going to ruin this sport.
     
  8. fvre4mvp

    fvre4mvp Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2005
    Messages:
    254
    Ratings:
    +0
    It's bad but it could be worse. Did anyone ever hear of bone conductivity??
    Bone conductivity passes sound waves through the teeth by biting down on a sensor and are used in snorkels. I could easily see guys using this method with their mouthguards.
     
  9. 4packgirl

    4packgirl Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2005
    Messages:
    2,415
    Ratings:
    +0
    i don't like it - not because i think players are gonna cheat but come ON. it's a lil bit like spotters in racing - never really liked that either - changes the sport completely, imo.
     
  10. jdlax

    jdlax Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2004
    Messages:
    818
    Ratings:
    +0
    I figure you lose 8 chances for your home crowd to do this, and you gain 8 chances where their home crowd can't. It evens out, right? :p
     
  11. cheesey

    cheesey Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2005
    Messages:
    1,000
    Ratings:
    +3
    Yes, but then the home crowds wouldn't have any reason to cheer anymore, as they would know it made no difference. It would take part of the fun out of being there. You might as well stay home and watch on TV.
    After all, the "NFL" DOES stand for NoFunLeague!
     
  12. cheesey

    cheesey Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2005
    Messages:
    1,000
    Ratings:
    +3
    I agree with this. What i mean is, some of the calls made are just plain wimpy. A D-lineman rushes the QB, puts his arm up to try to knock down a pass, and his arm bumps the QB's helmet. "Blow to the QB's head!" If the guy really whallops the QB's head, THEN call it. Or if it's obvious the guy is REALLY roughing the passer. I have seen WAY to many iffy calls on this. It's got to the point where if a D man BREATHES too hard on a QB, they will penalize it.
    It's like the kid that brings a 2 inch long "GI JOE" action figure gun to school, and they suspend him for bringing a weapon to school. (Yes, this really did happen!)
    Refs need to be able to have a little leeway to make a call, or let it go if it is obvious it wasn't an attempt to lay out a QB.
     

Share This Page