Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sunshinepacker" data-source="post: 550283" data-attributes="member: 9033"><p>It's NOT an explanation. It's an empty expression devoid of any actual analysis. It's like players saying they just "have to execute better". What aspect of spreading out the defense was SO advantageous to the Packers last year that we used 3+ WRs on 4 out of every 5 offensive plays? Conversely, what elements of other formations were so terrible that the Packers didn't dare use them more than a couple of times a game? Let's say there are 60 offensive plays a game. The Packers used 3 or more WRs on approximately 48 of those plays in every game (on average). That's only 12 plays a game that we didn't use at least 3 wide receivers. Consider too that Finley played five games last year so we had to go even MORE WR heavy after that to get the entire season average to 80% three or more WRs.</p></blockquote><p></p>

Total: 497 (members: 1, guests: 496)