Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Oates on Favre :
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WinnipegPackFan" data-source="post: 62570" data-attributes="member: 342"><p>Oates: Favre era has feel of bad ending </p><p>TOM OATES </p><p>608-252-6172 </p><p><a href="mailto:toates@madison.com">toates@madison.com</a> </p><p>As the national voices continue to squawk about how Brett Favre is holding the Green Bay Packers hostage, it is obvious they are watching Wisconsin's longest-running soap opera quite closely.</p><p></p><p>Just not close enough.</p><p></p><p>With a little more diligence, they would know that Favre isn't holding the Packers hostage because it has become even more apparent that general manager Ted Thompson and coach Mike McCarthy won't allow themselves to be held hostage by anyone, not even the greatest player in Packers history.</p><p></p><p>Favre has his wishes - to play a 15th season in Green Bay and do it for a Super Bowl contender - and Thompson and McCarthy have theirs - to rebuild the Packers from the ground up through the next couple of drafts.</p><p> </p><p>With the new regime and the old quarterback pushing conflicting agendas, it has created the greatest stalemate in Green Bay since general manager Tom Braatz and coach Lindy Infante were given 50-50 say in all football decisions back in the 1980s.</p><p></p><p>Thompson and McCarthy seem like they don't care whether Favre retires or returns, but have made it clear through their actions - or lack thereof - that if he does return he's going to have to play on whatever team they put together.</p><p></p><p>Favre wants only to play on a team capable of contending after last year's 4-12 train wreck and is clearly trying to, uh, encourage Thompson and McCarthy to throw him a bone - or, more accurately, a starting guard or two.</p><p></p><p>The most telling comment from Favre's most recent non-press conference showed just how far apart he and the Packers brass are on their thinking about next season.</p><p></p><p>"I'm not the GM, I'm not the head coach," Favre said. "I don't make those decisions. Never asked to. But I know when we signed Reggie White (in 1993) we knew we were going to be better right away. I think people associated with the Packers said, 'Now there's a signing that will make us better.'</p><p></p><p>"I think that's what we have to do. We have to make a statement again. You have to stay up with the NFL and teams are making statements. Sometimes you hit on them, sometimes you don't. I think we have to do that."</p><p></p><p>Thompson and McCarthy obviously don't agree. If they really wanted to make a statement and placate Favre, free agent defensive players Charles Woodson and LaVar Arrington would be apartment hunting in Green Bay by now. The Packers would have already used some of their $19 million in salary cap room (second-most in the NFL) and given Woodson and Arrington the mega-contracts they are seeking.</p><p></p><p>Instead, the Packers are waiting for the price tag on one or both to come down before they write a check, an approach that will probably drive them to sign elsewhere.</p><p></p><p>With Favre admitting that the free-agency window is virtually closed and this year's draft picks won't make much of an impact until next season, there no longer seems to be any way Thompson and McCarthy can make their quarterback happy.</p><p></p><p>And since stalemates seldom end well, it is beginning to look like the Favre era in Green Bay is going to end badly - just like the Braatz-Infante era before it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WinnipegPackFan, post: 62570, member: 342"] Oates: Favre era has feel of bad ending TOM OATES 608-252-6172 [email="toates@madison.com"]toates@madison.com[/email] As the national voices continue to squawk about how Brett Favre is holding the Green Bay Packers hostage, it is obvious they are watching Wisconsin's longest-running soap opera quite closely. Just not close enough. With a little more diligence, they would know that Favre isn't holding the Packers hostage because it has become even more apparent that general manager Ted Thompson and coach Mike McCarthy won't allow themselves to be held hostage by anyone, not even the greatest player in Packers history. Favre has his wishes - to play a 15th season in Green Bay and do it for a Super Bowl contender - and Thompson and McCarthy have theirs - to rebuild the Packers from the ground up through the next couple of drafts. With the new regime and the old quarterback pushing conflicting agendas, it has created the greatest stalemate in Green Bay since general manager Tom Braatz and coach Lindy Infante were given 50-50 say in all football decisions back in the 1980s. Thompson and McCarthy seem like they don't care whether Favre retires or returns, but have made it clear through their actions - or lack thereof - that if he does return he's going to have to play on whatever team they put together. Favre wants only to play on a team capable of contending after last year's 4-12 train wreck and is clearly trying to, uh, encourage Thompson and McCarthy to throw him a bone - or, more accurately, a starting guard or two. The most telling comment from Favre's most recent non-press conference showed just how far apart he and the Packers brass are on their thinking about next season. "I'm not the GM, I'm not the head coach," Favre said. "I don't make those decisions. Never asked to. But I know when we signed Reggie White (in 1993) we knew we were going to be better right away. I think people associated with the Packers said, 'Now there's a signing that will make us better.' "I think that's what we have to do. We have to make a statement again. You have to stay up with the NFL and teams are making statements. Sometimes you hit on them, sometimes you don't. I think we have to do that." Thompson and McCarthy obviously don't agree. If they really wanted to make a statement and placate Favre, free agent defensive players Charles Woodson and LaVar Arrington would be apartment hunting in Green Bay by now. The Packers would have already used some of their $19 million in salary cap room (second-most in the NFL) and given Woodson and Arrington the mega-contracts they are seeking. Instead, the Packers are waiting for the price tag on one or both to come down before they write a check, an approach that will probably drive them to sign elsewhere. With Favre admitting that the free-agency window is virtually closed and this year's draft picks won't make much of an impact until next season, there no longer seems to be any way Thompson and McCarthy can make their quarterback happy. And since stalemates seldom end well, it is beginning to look like the Favre era in Green Bay is going to end badly - just like the Braatz-Infante era before it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Packermudgeon
Emur
Sanguine camper
scheeler
Schultz
tynimiller
swhitset
weeds
gopkrs
Latest posts
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Sanguine camper
3 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: Thirteen Below
34 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: tynimiller
36 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: weeds
Today at 1:27 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 1:25 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Oates on Favre :
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top