Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="VersusTheMoose" data-source="post: 294711" data-attributes="member: 3997">Vancouver fans would have freaked out if the situations were reversed, no argument there. There are a lot of band-wagoners on both sides at this point of the season making the die hards look bad.Torres hit on Seabrook was not worth a suspension in my mind and in the minds of many (but not all of course) hockey fans. In my view it was a hockey play and the league was correct not suspending him. Even if the NHL suspended Torres he would have been back long before game 1 of the finals so you have no point there regardless. If you believe only Canuck fans will remember that unbelievable goal over a chomp you cannot have followed hockey for long or you are just a frustrated homer yourself. While I don't like that Burrows bit Bergeron, and he probably should have been suspended for game 2, he wasn't and Boston didn't deal with it very well.The facts are the Canucks have outplayed the Bruins for 6 of the 7 periods (including the very short OT period last night) so far and only need two more wins to raise Lord Stanley. Bruin fans can whine all into summer about what didn't go their way (even though the only reason they are this far is because some idiot was spared a suspension). Enjoy the ride, the Bruins are far from done and we could have 5 great games left to fight over.</blockquote>

Total: 469 (members: 2, guests: 467)