Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Voyageur" data-source="post: 983862" data-attributes="member: 17953">I see Jonesy's point. It's the posting date and time stamp at the top of our posts that tells him when the post was made. It doesn't differentiate what changed, within a post, if it's an edit. It could lead someone to believe that a person had submitted correct results on a game, after it was played.It isn't a matter of anyone doing it. There's nobody out here, to my knowledge, who would even consider doctoring their scores. But, it's the perception. When there's no doubt nothing could have happened, there are no questions regarding it.I don't know if a ruling that says all picks must be in before the Thursday game is a good one. Personally, I've missed it a couple of times, and once it cost me 25 points, and the second time (this past week) I was lucky enough to still get 12 right, end the 75% points. I missed Thursday, but was more than on-time with the rest of them.Whatever decision is made, I'm in.</blockquote>

Total: 590 (members: 4, guests: 586)