Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="sschind" data-source="post: 708369" data-attributes="member: 10247">The Patriots had plenty of opportunities to win the game yesterday, did they deserve an extra one?I was fine with the way it was even with the FG winning it but if they felt the need to change it they should have gone all the way with each team's offense getting their hands on the ball even if it is for just one play.The more think about it though the more I am liking Pokers idea of a set time for an extra period. That would work until the first time a team goes on a 15 minute drive and wins with a FG as time expires then we would be crying for a change again.Honestly I don't really care one way or the other.  Like I said before, I was fine with a FG winning it.  I'm OK with a TD winning it and I'd be fine with an extra period.  I'm also fine with ties in the regular season with no OT.  If you want excitement you eliminate the 2 minutes of kneel downs or dive plays to run the clock down to settle for a FG and OT.  If a coach knows an extra point will result in a tie I wonder how many would go for two.  Or if he knows a FG would end in a tie would he try for a TD.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 753 (members: 0, guests: 753)