Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="PackersRS" data-source="post: 246507" data-attributes="member: 1429">True, true. But those Ds are miles better than what the Bears have. And they need to at least have solid receivers. Deion Branch wasn't great but was solid. And Baltimore had a HoF in Shannon Sharpe. He was their Wr. As good as Olsen can be, he'll never be a Shannon Sharpe, Tony Gonzales type. He can't play wideout. And the Bears D can't be compared to the Ravens D back then... Right now, looking at their corps, I say they have the worst in the NFL. Who has a worse WR corps than the Bears, in all honesty? Maybe Miami, but Ginn is a better receiver than Hester...-If the Bears had one solid receiver, one solid DE, and if Pace can play, they would be contenders. If the vikes had one very good QB (which I don't think Favre can be anymore), they would be contenders. If Pickett and Jenkins can perform like they did in 2007, if Raji can live up to the hype, and if our OL can be productive, we will be contenders.</blockquote>

Total: 1,719 (members: 3, guests: 1,716)