Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
NFC North Predictions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1065249" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>While I might even agree that it’s certainly possible JJ could put those numbers up, those above predictions are actually a regression at QB when applying them to 2024 standards. That’s not a good recipe to improve off of 2024. Teams are the improving or regressing. That’s a regression at the most important position.</p><p></p><p>To be an improvement JJ needs (because he’s not a run threat)</p><p></p><p>~37 TD+ All Purpose</p><p>~11 INT</p><p>~4,400+ yards</p><p>~103% + Passer</p><p></p><p>I’ll give you this much tho Raptor. If JJ put up your numbers it’s at least arguable you made a good choice not paying Darnold $30Mil etc… Mainly due to the fact that your still give yourselves a chance for Postseason and would have good QB production and projected to ascend in 2026. I still wouldn’t just throw away a year after a 14-3 season. Just my opinion but I’m glad you guys walked Darnold.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 1065249, member: 10086"] While I might even agree that it’s certainly possible JJ could put those numbers up, those above predictions are actually a regression at QB when applying them to 2024 standards. That’s not a good recipe to improve off of 2024. Teams are the improving or regressing. That’s a regression at the most important position. To be an improvement JJ needs (because he’s not a run threat) ~37 TD+ All Purpose ~11 INT ~4,400+ yards ~103% + Passer I’ll give you this much tho Raptor. If JJ put up your numbers it’s at least arguable you made a good choice not paying Darnold $30Mil etc… Mainly due to the fact that your still give yourselves a chance for Postseason and would have good QB production and projected to ascend in 2026. I still wouldn’t just throw away a year after a 14-3 season. Just my opinion but I’m glad you guys walked Darnold. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
rmontro
Latest posts
R
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: rmontro
5 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
Today at 12:29 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Cornelius Weems
Today at 12:05 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 7:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Yesterday at 6:52 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
NFC North Predictions
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top