Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Heyjoe4" data-source="post: 1063628" data-attributes="member: 13032">Agreed.  Trades like this are all about paying for past performance.  They are expensive in terms of draft capital required, as well as $$$.  Hendrickson likely wants Garret and Watt money, $40 mil per.  No thanks.If it is required to plug a hole for a SB run (the Rams did this by acquiring Stafford), then it's probably worth it.  Unfortunately, the Packers have been more than one player away from a serious SB run.  Has that changed this offseason?  I don't think so.  I hope I'm wrong.The Packers did this with Reggie White and later with Charles Woodson, and won SBs both times.  Although those were FA signings, not trades.After the infamous trade for John Hadl, the Packers' organization should be rightfully cautious of big trades.  OMG just thinking of that trade causes pain.  Two firsts, two seconds and a third round pick.  Five very valuable draft spot for a Once v good but then washed up QB.  Ouch, indeed.Did the Bears acquire Khalil Mack in FA or was that a trade?  Don't recall.  At least Mack had several good years left in him. I think he's still playing in San Diego.</blockquote>

Total: 813 (members: 2, guests: 811)