Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Thirteen Below" data-source="post: 1034082" data-attributes="member: 18006">I don't know what Minnesota was thinking with all those trades, unless it was just a desperate move to go all in before Green Bay builds a team so strong they wouldn't be able to catch us for several more years. But if that's it, I think they wasted their time, because they just weren't close enough to make that viable. They're only going to have 4 picks next year - 2 Top 100 picks  (their current 1st, and a 3rd round comp pick  for Cousins), and then 2 more in the 5th. This draft is going to hurt them for a couple of years to come, and I don't think they got enough to justify  that.Chicago got some good players, because with two picks in the Top 10 how can you fail. But if your team has as many needs as they do, and you only have 5 picks to fill those holes, is it really a smart move to **** away a 4th on a punter?Then again, maybe there was some wisdom to it. With all the problems they're going to have this season,  the punter will probably be taking 20% of all their offensive snaps.</blockquote>

Total: 221 (members: 3, guests: 218)