Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
NFC 2026/ NFC North 2026
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1099297" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>As far as Chicago I think losing Dalman to retirement and then their LT, Trapilo in our Wild Card to an Achilles is a significant blow. It’s not to say Bradbury or Garrett can’t play Center but it’s likely both going to match Dalman’s play is unlikely.</p><p></p><p>Then we know well that changes at LT can be risky. Although I think GB has the upper hand. imo Jordan Morgan has a better chance of grading out improved over Rasheed Walker Vs. someone improving over Trapilo in Chicago. It’s very possible that Chicago OL takes a step backwards in Pass or Run sets. It also forced Chicago to spend #57 at Center when they could’ve upgraded their Roster there. Both their Centers are likely capable, neither are likely going to match or improve Dalman’s ability imo. Result? Lost #57 overall.</p><p></p><p>The Safety Room in Chicago was overhauled. Coby Bryant is a good solid Safety somewhere in that Evan Williams impact. Then Chicago spent their #25 overall fixing their losses with Thieneman. Again not that I think he’s not good, but they once again used a Rookie to try to patch a Seasoned Starters role. Long term that’s fine but most players take a minute to transition.</p><p></p><p>RD3 in Chicago was a head scratcher. Not because Sam Roush is bad.But once again the theme was dis of make them that much better. Are you going to Sit Loveland or Cole Kmet. That’s a really good TE pair. Unless you use a high % of 13 Personnel? The bigger benefit is really depth. So Chicago spent 1-2-3 for a chance at maintaining Status quo or as depth.</p><p></p><p>RD3 Zavion Thomas isn’t a bad WR for #89, but is that your response to losing DJ Moore? Or id he your equivalent to Luther Burden Rookie impact if Burden is WR1? The theme is these were really primarily replacing lost talent imo, except for a 3rd TE being covered up in 2026.</p><p></p><p>Is Malik Muhammad TODAYS answer at #124 overall? Or is he possible more feared towards future need at CB. He’s a great pick but likely not a high impact 2025 upgrade either. </p><p></p><p>Jorden Van Den Berg is a great prospect to gamble on late in the draft. I really liked that selection.. probably the most for value. He’s a Day 3 Boom or Bust. Plus Chicago doesn’t really have much past Sweat, so he can earn time if he shows up early in Pass Rush. He could actually be their best immediate upgrade IF they hit gold.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 1099297, member: 10086"] As far as Chicago I think losing Dalman to retirement and then their LT, Trapilo in our Wild Card to an Achilles is a significant blow. It’s not to say Bradbury or Garrett can’t play Center but it’s likely both going to match Dalman’s play is unlikely. Then we know well that changes at LT can be risky. Although I think GB has the upper hand. imo Jordan Morgan has a better chance of grading out improved over Rasheed Walker Vs. someone improving over Trapilo in Chicago. It’s very possible that Chicago OL takes a step backwards in Pass or Run sets. It also forced Chicago to spend #57 at Center when they could’ve upgraded their Roster there. Both their Centers are likely capable, neither are likely going to match or improve Dalman’s ability imo. Result? Lost #57 overall. The Safety Room in Chicago was overhauled. Coby Bryant is a good solid Safety somewhere in that Evan Williams impact. Then Chicago spent their #25 overall fixing their losses with Thieneman. Again not that I think he’s not good, but they once again used a Rookie to try to patch a Seasoned Starters role. Long term that’s fine but most players take a minute to transition. RD3 in Chicago was a head scratcher. Not because Sam Roush is bad.But once again the theme was dis of make them that much better. Are you going to Sit Loveland or Cole Kmet. That’s a really good TE pair. Unless you use a high % of 13 Personnel? The bigger benefit is really depth. So Chicago spent 1-2-3 for a chance at maintaining Status quo or as depth. RD3 Zavion Thomas isn’t a bad WR for #89, but is that your response to losing DJ Moore? Or id he your equivalent to Luther Burden Rookie impact if Burden is WR1? The theme is these were really primarily replacing lost talent imo, except for a 3rd TE being covered up in 2026. Is Malik Muhammad TODAYS answer at #124 overall? Or is he possible more feared towards future need at CB. He’s a great pick but likely not a high impact 2025 upgrade either. Jorden Van Den Berg is a great prospect to gamble on late in the draft. I really liked that selection.. probably the most for value. He’s a Day 3 Boom or Bust. Plus Chicago doesn’t really have much past Sweat, so he can earn time if he shows up early in Pass Rush. He could actually be their best immediate upgrade IF they hit gold. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Firethorn1001
Capitol 8805
Latest posts
2026 Draft Rd 6 #35 K Trey Smack Florida
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
7 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
11 minutes ago
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: CarryTheG14
Today at 9:04 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
NFC 2026/ NFC North 2026
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 8:35 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 8:05 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
NFC 2026/ NFC North 2026
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
