Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Next QB?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 864440" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>That’s exactly it. It depends where the team is at from a momentum perspective. Then from a financial standpoint and what type of draft resources that team possesses. I do agree there’s a healthy balance of factors to consider.</p><p></p><p>My point being we have to pick n choose when and where to double down. The QB position is the Queen of the chessboard and guys like Ron Wolf would tell us there is an entire philosophy of weighting that position with resources in many seasons. As you said, maybe not so much coming off 6-9-1. But as you stated.. at 13-3? Absolutely a valid argument there.</p><p></p><p>If there are no veteran trade options in that 2-5M range.. that’s ok, but we shouldn’t stop there. There should, more often than not, be a late round selection used to bolster the QB room. Especially when your holding 5 picks in rounds 6-7. That’s just a no brainer.</p><p>Keep in mind that often, from a statistical view, said QB #2 just need to win several games and he’s improving even when he’s not starting. It’s not always a season ending situation. QB insurance is never a good deal on its face..until we need to make a claim.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 864440, member: 10086"] That’s exactly it. It depends where the team is at from a momentum perspective. Then from a financial standpoint and what type of draft resources that team possesses. I do agree there’s a healthy balance of factors to consider. My point being we have to pick n choose when and where to double down. The QB position is the Queen of the chessboard and guys like Ron Wolf would tell us there is an entire philosophy of weighting that position with resources in many seasons. As you said, maybe not so much coming off 6-9-1. But as you stated.. at 13-3? Absolutely a valid argument there. If there are no veteran trade options in that 2-5M range.. that’s ok, but we shouldn’t stop there. There should, more often than not, be a late round selection used to bolster the QB room. Especially when your holding 5 picks in rounds 6-7. That’s just a no brainer. Keep in mind that often, from a statistical view, said QB #2 just need to win several games and he’s improving even when he’s not starting. It’s not always a season ending situation. QB insurance is never a good deal on its face..until we need to make a claim. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Who Will Start?
Latest: Poppa San
20 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Time to call Brett back from the woodshed....
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 7:11 PM
Brett Favre Discussion
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 7:00 PM
Draft Talk
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: weeds
Today at 6:45 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
29th pick.. Eric stokes db
Latest: DoURant
Today at 6:32 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Next QB?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top