Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 437329" data-attributes="member: 4300">Great. What’s Neal planning for an encore, committing a crime? The only thing “better” than Neal’s suspension is the over-reaction to it here.  To expand on what SpartaChris posted, IMO at this point it would be foolish for Thompson to cut Neal. The Packers have already paid him the majority of his contract, the financial damage is already done. According to one source, Neal will cost $780K against the cap this season, in fact since he doesn’t get paid for those 4 games, his cap number should be less. Even if it isn’t, he’ll take up 0.65% of the “stated” $120.6M cap and the Packers cap is higher than that. And his deal is up after the 2013 season.   Could you expand on this thought? I’d be interested in your guess as to his motivation and your theory on why Ted’s Tightwad didn’t beat you to making this comment. (Just kidding on the last question.)   One player doesn’t work out and that proves what? And JenningsLongCatch who here was “counting on Neal” going into the 2012 season? I haven’t read all of the posts of course but I don’t remember a single one.  I remind all those harping on Neal being injury prone that Charles Woodson was also “injury prone” before Thompson signed him. </blockquote>

Total: 507 (members: 3, guests: 504)