GBPack2010
Cheesehead
He needs to get his head straight...
Sarcasm, really? You're the one who whined about others being sarcastic and you are the one who posted, “Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit.” Beyond that can you not understand two concepts simultaneously? While Charles Woodson is on his way to the HOF and Mike Neal is in a struggle to make the roster, they can share characteristics such as both being labeled “injury prone” before they were acquired by the Packers.Both are black... both play for the Packers... both went to Big 10 schools... both have two feet, ten fingers and ten toes... the similarities are INSANE!!!!!!
We ALL were pissed off when Mike Neal was announced as our pick in round 2 in 2010.
And congrats to Frank for what must be a record setting turnaround! You must have been pissed off and hopeful at the same time.Most of those in that category had no idea who Mike Neal was and just assumed Ted knew best. Or hoped. I, too, hoped.
TJV - be gentle now. Any sign of wit, even its lowest form, can be considered an improvement.Sarcasm, really? You're the one who whined about others being sarcastic and you are the one who posted, “Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit.” Beyond that can you not understand two concepts simultaneously? While Charles Woodson is on his way to the HOF and Mike Neal is in a struggle to make the roster, they can share characteristics such as both being labeled “injury prone” before they were acquired by the Packers.
Not being able to understand what “and/or” means is one thing, but your use of sarcasm must break the forum record for such a quick display of hypocrisy.
Sarcasm, really? You're the one who whined about others being sarcastic and you are the one who posted, “Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit.” Beyond that can you not understand two concepts simultaneously? While Charles Woodson is on his way to the HOF and Mike Neal is in a struggle to make the roster, they can share characteristics such as both being labeled “injury prone” before they were acquired by the Packers.[/quote]
Is it too hard to say "comparing Charles Woodson, a first ballot HOF player, to Mike Neal, a guy with 9 career tackles, was dumb?
And congrats to Frank for what must be a record setting turnaround! You must have been pissed off and hopeful at the same time.
Called this thread back up based on latest info.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...says-suspension-was-caused-by-a-technicality/
I read that article too and the first thing that came to my mind is; how many of us think Neal will be gone from the Pack this year? He never panned out to be what he was hired to be.
As evidence his performance was not enhanced, Neal supplied the league tape of his play during the 2011 season. In upholding his suspension the panel agreed his play was terrible but stated, 'that doesn't change the results of the test'."
(JK - I added the last two sentences.)
you can't give up on a guy with his potential yet. His injuries have been frustrating and if what he is saying about the circumstances of his positive test are true, we must see if he can stay healthy for once.I read that article too and the first thing that came to my mind is; how many of us think Neal will be gone from the Pack this year? He never panned out to be what he was hired to be.
you can't give up on a guy with his potential yet. His injuries have been frustrating and if what he is saying about the circumstances of his positive test are true, we must see if he can stay healthy for once.I read that article too and the first thing that came to my mind is; how many of us think Neal will be gone from the Pack this year? He never panned out to be what he was hired to be.
What if Mike Neal actually blossoms into a stud?
Can you imagine that?
He makes the pro bowl next year and drinks are on me.
hope you like warm rail ginQuoted for proof!