Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Most "Likely" Trade Partners BOTH Ways Explained...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 953404" data-attributes="member: 17987"><p>The nice thing is that it seems to me (I don't know how teams/GMs actually see it, of course) that most of these top-5 WRs seem to be regarded by analysts/pundits/"experts"/etc to all be pretty close to one another without any one of them being a standout/consensus top choice ahead of the others. So I feel like odds are that probably at least 1/5 is available when we're up at 22... I guess perhaps the only exception there for us might be Williams as we may feel we need someone who is ready day one, rather than having to potentially wait a few months for recovery.</p><p></p><p>And while I'd prefer to see us grab one of these guys, I also kinda feel like if we determine there's better value in a different position at 22 (EDGE, OL, etc)...I don't know if any would slip to 28, but even still I think there's a handful of guys in that "second tier" of WR who would likely be available there and still be a good investment (Dotson, Watson, etc). And beyond that there is probably still some value further down the board in round 2 and beyond like Pierce, Tolbert, etc, or later with a dynamic TE like Jelani Woods or someone. All that to say that without moving around too much I think that we've thankfully (with the returns of Rasul, De'Vondre, Tonyan, etc) put ourselves in a position where we have quite a few options and can afford to be somewhat flexible.</p><p></p><p>In general though I think that #1 and #3 are probably most likely. Unless we get to a point where all of those "top 5" guys are already gone I think we're going WR at #22 (and I'd be shocked if we made it out of the 1st without one) but I could certainly see getting to #28 and feeling like we've already got our biggest need addressed and that there's more value in moving down at that point.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Magooch, post: 953404, member: 17987"] The nice thing is that it seems to me (I don't know how teams/GMs actually see it, of course) that most of these top-5 WRs seem to be regarded by analysts/pundits/"experts"/etc to all be pretty close to one another without any one of them being a standout/consensus top choice ahead of the others. So I feel like odds are that probably at least 1/5 is available when we're up at 22... I guess perhaps the only exception there for us might be Williams as we may feel we need someone who is ready day one, rather than having to potentially wait a few months for recovery. And while I'd prefer to see us grab one of these guys, I also kinda feel like if we determine there's better value in a different position at 22 (EDGE, OL, etc)...I don't know if any would slip to 28, but even still I think there's a handful of guys in that "second tier" of WR who would likely be available there and still be a good investment (Dotson, Watson, etc). And beyond that there is probably still some value further down the board in round 2 and beyond like Pierce, Tolbert, etc, or later with a dynamic TE like Jelani Woods or someone. All that to say that without moving around too much I think that we've thankfully (with the returns of Rasul, De'Vondre, Tonyan, etc) put ourselves in a position where we have quite a few options and can afford to be somewhat flexible. In general though I think that #1 and #3 are probably most likely. Unless we get to a point where all of those "top 5" guys are already gone I think we're going WR at #22 (and I'd be shocked if we made it out of the 1st without one) but I could certainly see getting to #28 and feeling like we've already got our biggest need addressed and that there's more value in moving down at that point. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
tynimiller
Firethorn1001
weeds
Green_Bay_Packers
PackerinSD
Latest posts
S
The Packers All-Personality Team
Latest: Schultz
19 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Schultz
24 minutes ago
Draft Talk
H
Dark Horse Candidates
Latest: Heyjoe4
30 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Free Agency Thread
Latest: Sanguine camper
56 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
A
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: Arodgers12
Today at 8:53 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Most "Likely" Trade Partners BOTH Ways Explained...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top