Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="porky88" data-source="post: 81687" data-attributes="member: 489">It's really only 2 or 3. Zero seem to take my points valid and mentioned that the turnovers need to come down and hinted that Favre is at fault as well.Not comparing Schroederâ€™s Packers to 2005 Packers. Just comparing the talent level at WR which is fairly close. I haven't ignored the fact that Green Bay was injured. I've stated that's part of the reason he had 29 INT's as is his decision making.Physically Favre is still a top 4-7 QB. I said that as well. You'd know if you read my posts all the way through. Mentally I question him.This proves you didn't read my posts. I'm not blaming everything on Favre. I'm the only that is including him in the blaming. Here is the best line from one of my posts that sums up what I've been saying...Favre is just at fault as the player next to him. As the WR's running the "wrong" routes all day long. As the offensive line. As the coaching. Those aren't excuses for Favre like people seem to be making. Those are apart of the reason why Favre struggled as is Favre himself. That's what I've been saying. You don't throw 29 INT's and not have it be some just some of your fault.I agree..I was comparing Favre from last season to how Kerry Collins has played for his career. Lot of yards and lot of picks. In the 70's for his passer rating. I wasn't comparing Favre's entire career to Kerry Collins.</blockquote>

Total: 205 (members: 1, guests: 204)