Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 877486">Once again, last season worked as evidence that the Packers made the right decision to move on from Daniels as he was healthy enough to play a total of only 200 snaps last season.While it's possible that he bounces back the odds are stacked against himand the Packers should look somewhere else to improve the defensive line.Daniels injury history and reasons to be concerned about it has been well documented in this thread. No reason to be a **** about it because you choose to ignore it.I wasn't in favor of the Packers offering Bulaga that kind of money because of his injury history either.As a side note, Bulaga (1,779) played significantly more snaps than Daniels (623) over the past two seasons.</blockquote>

Total: 794 (members: 3, guests: 791)