Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Montgomery - "Soft Tissue Injury" or Something Else?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PikeBadger" data-source="post: 731922" data-attributes="member: 8789"><p>It appears that I'm in the minority on this topic. I don't think it's of great import that we have a traditionally well-defined dominant #1 RB in this offense. Clearly, Rodgers is the maestro of this offense. In recent years, we had a primary workhorse RB in Lacy but I don't believe it's necessary at all. I like the idea of using RB by committee at this point especially with the diversity at the RB position. I think it gives opposing Def coordinators more to prepare for and increases the likelihood of favorable matchups for our offense. I really like the diversity of the personnel makeup of our offense right now. Imo, it will be up to McCarthy/Rodgers to recognize and exploit the advantages that present themselves with the myriad of different looks and matchups that present themselves. Should be fun to watch and very difficult to defend.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PikeBadger, post: 731922, member: 8789"] It appears that I'm in the minority on this topic. I don't think it's of great import that we have a traditionally well-defined dominant #1 RB in this offense. Clearly, Rodgers is the maestro of this offense. In recent years, we had a primary workhorse RB in Lacy but I don't believe it's necessary at all. I like the idea of using RB by committee at this point especially with the diversity at the RB position. I think it gives opposing Def coordinators more to prepare for and increases the likelihood of favorable matchups for our offense. I really like the diversity of the personnel makeup of our offense right now. Imo, it will be up to McCarthy/Rodgers to recognize and exploit the advantages that present themselves with the myriad of different looks and matchups that present themselves. Should be fun to watch and very difficult to defend. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
swhitset
Team Ronny
ExpatPacker
Green_Bay_Packers
Sanguine camper
PackerinSD
tynimiller
scheeler
Latest posts
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Sanguine camper
7 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: Thirteen Below
54 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: tynimiller
55 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: weeds
Today at 1:27 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 1:25 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Montgomery - "Soft Tissue Injury" or Something Else?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top