Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="PikeBadger" data-source="post: 731922" data-attributes="member: 8789"><p>It appears that I'm in the minority on this topic. I don't think it's of great import that we have a traditionally well-defined dominant #1 RB in this offense. Clearly, Rodgers is the maestro of this offense. In recent years, we had a primary workhorse RB in Lacy but I don't believe it's necessary at all. I like the idea of using RB by committee at this point especially with the diversity at the RB position. I think it gives opposing Def coordinators more to prepare for and increases the likelihood of favorable matchups for our offense. I really like the diversity of the personnel makeup of our offense right now. Imo, it will be up to McCarthy/Rodgers to recognize and exploit the advantages that present themselves with the myriad of different looks and matchups that present themselves. Should be fun to watch and very difficult to defend.</p></blockquote><p></p>

No members online now.

Total: 303 (members: 0, guests: 303)