Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
MLF decision making process
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Voyageur" data-source="post: 1078759" data-attributes="member: 17953"><p>I've been saying it since the second game of the year. I said it last year, and it bit us repeatedly. LeFleur's game calling is predictable. Especially in rushed situations, and on short yardage plays. Even Josh Jacobs has said it now, indicating that on that failed 4th and 1 the Eagles knew exactly what the Packers were going to do, and essentially sold all out on it knowing they weren't just guessing but had it right.</p><p></p><p>People can say, "Yeah, but the fumble made it fail." Nope! That's not true. The fact that the play was doomed from the start caused mishandling of the ball because the rush was on them before they even started to develop the play. Our entire center of the line collapsed because of the onslaught of defenders crowding them.</p><p></p><p>I'm beginning to wonder if LeFleur is HC material to be honest. He may not show it or have what he considers legitimate excuses for the failures but to me Jacobs' comment tells a story of a head coach who has been diagnosed effectively by our opponents. Of course, none of them are saying so because they all want to see the Packers eliminated.</p><p></p><p>Not only is LeFleur predictable, but we also have a QB who fits into the same mold and doesn't really see his best options on the field way too often. Don't be fooled by gaudy completion percentages and fewer INTs because the majority of Love's passes rely on the receiver getting most of the yards on runs after catches. Then there's the second and third problems. He focuses on one, possibly two receivers for too long because he doesn't visualize what's happening as well as an elite QB should. By the time he's ready to progress to the third option he's pressured and has to either dump the ball to a short safety valve, throw it into traffic, or into the ground for an incompletion. This does not move the chains.</p><p></p><p>An elite QB would see that certain players are coming open on broken plays and that's where the ball needs to go. There were at least two cases against the Eagles where there were easy passes available to Doubs for distance and Love opted to throw it into the dirt in traffic, not even seeing him directly behind the direction of the throw. It tells me Love has poor peripheral vision when it comes to seeing the whole field and I've never seen a QB was considered elite fail to have that particular trait.</p><p></p><p>Please understand. I'm not complaining. I'm just stating facts based on what I'm seeing on the field. The Packers are and will be the product of LeFleur and Love as they shape the offense moving forward. There's absolutely nothing we can complain about when it comes to the defense. They're playing lights out. How many games have we lost now this year where we held the opposition to 16 or less points? That should tell the whole story.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Voyageur, post: 1078759, member: 17953"] I've been saying it since the second game of the year. I said it last year, and it bit us repeatedly. LeFleur's game calling is predictable. Especially in rushed situations, and on short yardage plays. Even Josh Jacobs has said it now, indicating that on that failed 4th and 1 the Eagles knew exactly what the Packers were going to do, and essentially sold all out on it knowing they weren't just guessing but had it right. People can say, "Yeah, but the fumble made it fail." Nope! That's not true. The fact that the play was doomed from the start caused mishandling of the ball because the rush was on them before they even started to develop the play. Our entire center of the line collapsed because of the onslaught of defenders crowding them. I'm beginning to wonder if LeFleur is HC material to be honest. He may not show it or have what he considers legitimate excuses for the failures but to me Jacobs' comment tells a story of a head coach who has been diagnosed effectively by our opponents. Of course, none of them are saying so because they all want to see the Packers eliminated. Not only is LeFleur predictable, but we also have a QB who fits into the same mold and doesn't really see his best options on the field way too often. Don't be fooled by gaudy completion percentages and fewer INTs because the majority of Love's passes rely on the receiver getting most of the yards on runs after catches. Then there's the second and third problems. He focuses on one, possibly two receivers for too long because he doesn't visualize what's happening as well as an elite QB should. By the time he's ready to progress to the third option he's pressured and has to either dump the ball to a short safety valve, throw it into traffic, or into the ground for an incompletion. This does not move the chains. An elite QB would see that certain players are coming open on broken plays and that's where the ball needs to go. There were at least two cases against the Eagles where there were easy passes available to Doubs for distance and Love opted to throw it into the dirt in traffic, not even seeing him directly behind the direction of the throw. It tells me Love has poor peripheral vision when it comes to seeing the whole field and I've never seen a QB was considered elite fail to have that particular trait. Please understand. I'm not complaining. I'm just stating facts based on what I'm seeing on the field. The Packers are and will be the product of LeFleur and Love as they shape the offense moving forward. There's absolutely nothing we can complain about when it comes to the defense. They're playing lights out. How many games have we lost now this year where we held the opposition to 16 or less points? That should tell the whole story. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: El Guapo
Yesterday at 10:50 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 5:13 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 12:42 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 11:14 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Off Season News
Latest: milani
Sunday at 2:18 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
MLF decision making process
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
