Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="tynimiller" data-source="post: 1032566" data-attributes="member: 6578">One thing I've always known, but learned recently many have no clue of is that missing measurables CAN and DO impact the formulas used in any athletic testing measurement - RAS being arguably the most refined one IMO.In case that didn't make sense to anyone let me share what I mean with one of my personal favorite Day 2 off ball linebackers Cedric Gray.If you look up the most current RAS Card for Cedric Gray you're going to get:[ATTACH=full]20333[/ATTACH]Now here's what I mean. Say Gray's camp chose to not do any bench testing at all....[ATTACH=full]20334[/ATTACH]Now what if they chose to not do shuttle:[ATTACH=full]20335[/ATTACH]The more variables you enter into a formula the more refined it becomes. Numerous folks cross off or add on guys to a list strictly because of RAS....however base nothing on how much confidence to lay in it? Are there variables missing.....are there variables which a certain position seems to be preferred for a certain position (example GB really prefers the shuttle it seems for their OL as an indicator).Just wanted to throw this out there.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 665 (members: 0, guests: 665)