Since you were talking about keenum, so was I, but if the Vikes want to invest big dollars into either of those guys I'm good with it.Yeah, him or Cousins?
Since you were talking about keenum, so was I, but if the Vikes want to invest big dollars into either of those guys I'm good with it.Yeah, him or Cousins?
Ah I didn’t know that! It was probably a case of giving him longer to heal up. If they do pay Keenum I’ll be genuinely shocked as guys like him are literally solid back ups, not starters
Then pay the man his money. I really hope they do
Yeah, okay. You do realize the last 5 weeks he out played Brady, Bortles, Goff, Roethlisberger and Brees? But yeah, he overachieved.
Forget that! I’m getting out in front because I think we will have better coaching on defense and plenty of new additions to the overall talent level thanks to the front office. Minnesota is ripe for a 7-9 season. I’m all in baby!!!We have a lot of work to do. We're in a good position to do so, but let's not get a head of ourselves
i'm all in every yearForget that! I’m getting out in front because I think we will have better coaching on defense and plenty of new additions to the overall talent level thanks to the front office. Minnesota is ripe for a 7-9 season. I’m all in baby!!!
Me too. I’m a glass almost full guy, every year.i'm all in every year
Me too. I’m a glass almost full guy, every year.
Can't speak for him ... but for me... nope. Looking at it from a positive viewpoint provides plenty of enjoyment with a much shorter period of disappointment than the other way around. Last year might be a bit of an exception because I was forced to keep watching games after Rodgers went down with very little possibility of a positive outcome, but the past few years of getting at least to the playoffs if not the NFCCG... has meant many hopeful and enjoyable games... when the season is over .... I can focus on other things. I realize you see it differently and I respect that..but that doesn't change my own perspective.Must have been pretty crushing for you since 2010 - starting half empty doesn't hurt nearly as much.
The Vikings have never had a QB start for 16 games in back to back seasons. The biggest fear of Packer fans should be if MN gets a QB that is capable of doing that. Packer fans should also take a bow to he football gods for having to HOF QB's back to back. That in itself is a rarity. New England fans will find out how rare in the next few years.A couple thoughts
1. Minnesota won't be mediocre. They have young talent and are not built around a single player
2. Minnesota will struggle to find a qb to produce like keenum. Even though he isn't elite he produced like a top 10. They likely won't match that production
3. That said what they lose at qb as they come back to earth they likely make up for at rb with cook coming back
4. There are likely to have more injuries on defense this year. I don't think they had a starter miss more than 2 games. That won't happen again
5. They are jerks for not letting their qb coach interview for the OC job for the Giants. Looks petty. Guy has a chance to move up the coaching ladder and you just passed him up for your for your oc position.
Those here thinking the Vikings are just lucky and will fall off the map next season need to take off the green and gold glasses and have a cup of reality.
Minnesota has a much, much better roster than we do. And they added a franchise QB to an offense which made a career journeyman look like a good QB. Forgive me if I'm not buying that.Doubling down on my return to mediocrity prognostication though. Minny paying Kirk Cousins $30 million a year is gonna come back to bite them in the *** so big they're going to be losing talent all over the board. They also got a terrible draft position and are only going to get bad picks where they are. While I doubt Keenum will have another good year in Denver, you just always figure there is some value in continuity where keeping a guy on who's not a money sucker at least doesn't carry nearly as high the risks. Going out, getting a guy and paying him 2x what he's worth though is a terrible move that's going to have some pretty bad consequences coming with it.
Minnesota has a much, much better roster than we do. And they added a franchise QB to an offense which made a career journeyman look like a good QB. Forgive me if I'm not buying that.
You act as if they had $0 invested in the QB position prior to signing Cousins. It's true that he counts more against the bottom line, but Bradford still averaged $18M per year during the prior two seasons.You got terrible math skills then cuz you can't pay a guy more money than Matt Stafford and not end up losing huge pieces of the team that had success the previous year. The roster is going to start crumbling because of this, and despite what some idiots around here think, Rodgers' contract is going to stay lower than Cousins' or Brees'.
You act as if they had $0 invested in the QB position prior to signing Cousins. It's true that he counts more against the bottom line, but Bradford still averaged $18M per year during the prior two seasons.
You are correct that many teams begin to decline once they succeed and have worse draft positions, and they have to invest a lot of money in talent that was once cheap. But NE has proven that you can have your cake and eat it for decades, so I wouldn't assume they will fall apart just because several other teams have.
They won't finish with less than 10 wins unless they have some injury issues on defense. And not the 1 game variety of injuries.
Bradford still averaged $18M per year during the prior two seasons.