Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Clay&#039;s Jock Strap" data-source="post: 268986" data-attributes="member: 1977">Understood, but they think (at least I think they think - otherwise what is the point of the discussion?) that they were the "champs" in 1969. They weren't, the Chiefs were. IMO, this is similar to major league baseball before interleague (when teams from the two "leauges" never played each other until the WS) play. It is like a team winning the American League pennant and losing the World Series, but wanting to call themselves champions. The only sticking point is the semantical use of the acronym N.F.L. which didn't mean exactly what it does today. Queen fans are trying to distort truth for some unknown reason. In 1969 they took 2nd place even if they took 1st in the "NFL"... They played a title game versus the AFL and LOST... BIG. Their argument is semantics and they know it.  Yes, you are stating a "fact" but a semantical one only.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 613 (members: 0, guests: 613)