Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Mike Pettine's Defence
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mradtke66" data-source="post: 862255" data-attributes="member: 4199"><p>I'm willing to agree with that, at in least in part. I do find myself wondering where/why we took a step back.</p><p></p><p>I think most (all?) of us agree that ILB was a weakness and we did more or less nothing to improve the position. That's also not a dig--only so many resources each year and I feel they did very well addressing most of our holes.</p><p></p><p>We cut Jenkins, but our run defense improved last year without him in the line up. Clark is still great and honestly still ascending. No problem there. Lowry is a poor-man's Kampman and while not a playmaker, not the kind of guy who (generally) makes mistakes. I think where we're hurting here (as I previously said) is Adams being a disappointment and Lancaster not improving. I do wonder if Lancaster is just a 2-Down, run plugging NT. If his role is the snap-eater between the 20s, he'd be worth continuing to bring back. If we want him at 3/5T in base, it might be time to move on from him. </p><p></p><p>So I guess we're back to wanting that big but long 3/5T. Damn you Mike Neal and Datone Jones for not being able to fill the role you were perfectly physically suited for. And of course some better linebackers. What does the FA class look like--I'm told the draft class is weak.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mradtke66, post: 862255, member: 4199"] I'm willing to agree with that, at in least in part. I do find myself wondering where/why we took a step back. I think most (all?) of us agree that ILB was a weakness and we did more or less nothing to improve the position. That's also not a dig--only so many resources each year and I feel they did very well addressing most of our holes. We cut Jenkins, but our run defense improved last year without him in the line up. Clark is still great and honestly still ascending. No problem there. Lowry is a poor-man's Kampman and while not a playmaker, not the kind of guy who (generally) makes mistakes. I think where we're hurting here (as I previously said) is Adams being a disappointment and Lancaster not improving. I do wonder if Lancaster is just a 2-Down, run plugging NT. If his role is the snap-eater between the 20s, he'd be worth continuing to bring back. If we want him at 3/5T in base, it might be time to move on from him. So I guess we're back to wanting that big but long 3/5T. Damn you Mike Neal and Datone Jones for not being able to fill the role you were perfectly physically suited for. And of course some better linebackers. What does the FA class look like--I'm told the draft class is weak. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Pkrjones
gopkrs
DoURant
Latest posts
UDFA Signings 2025
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 10:07 AM
Draft Talk
Isaiah Simmons is COMING
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 10:00 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Pick 87 Savion Williams WR TCU
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 9:15 AM
Draft Talk
2025 NFL Schedule Release
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 8:41 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Pick 198 Warren Brinson DT Georgia
Latest: Sanguine camper
Yesterday at 7:49 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Mike Pettine's Defence
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top