Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="jrock645" data-source="post: 665167" data-attributes="member: 11661">I think the bigger issue is the overlap between Bennet and Clements and the lack of a WR's coach. MM giving up play calling wasn't the problem. The complete breakdown in play by the receivers was. Even scaling the grade to make it more favorable without Jordy, and factoring injuries those guys were awful. The logical thing would be send Bennet back to wr's, have Clements as OC and playcaller. The whole Bennet as OC, but Clements as assoc head coach and playcaller didn't make the first bit of sense.I like the idea of MM actually being able to oversee the team as a whole. It makes sense. I think the knee jerk reaction might be just going back to how things were, when they got part of the transition right. The defense and st's got better, and the units seemed to play to each other better. That was important, and definitely noticeable. Problem was, MM took back play calling and we still just couldn't manage to make the couple plays late in the Arizona game to win it. How much of that had to do with MM being too involved in his play sheet to be in tune with what was happening on defense?</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 40 (members: 0, guests: 40)