Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
NFL Discussions
Looking ahead to 2012
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Crazy Packers Fan" data-source="post: 429100" data-attributes="member: 3311"><p>2012 is a make-or-break year for those of us who dreamed of another Packers dynasty.</p><p> </p><p>No one outside Pittsburgh considers the Steelers of 2005 and 2008 to be a dynasty. In fact, not even most Steelers fans call themselves a dynasty of the 2000s (they simply whine that they would have won every Super Bowl during the 2000s if not for those pesky officials!). The Patriots failed miserably in 2002, but they bounced back to win back-to-back titles in 2003 and 2004. If the Packers are to be remembered as a dynasty and not just a good team, they need to win it all next year. Else we might be looking back at these years the same way we look back at the late 90s - as missed opportunities to have a dynasty.</p><p> </p><p>That's why I literally cried after the loss on Sunday, the same way I did after the Super Bowl XXXII loss. Because everything pointed to it being "our year." (Then again I'm a loser who has nothing else going for him besides the Packers.) My theme for 2011 was "glory" - we failed at achieving that. My theme for 2012 is "redemption."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Crazy Packers Fan, post: 429100, member: 3311"] 2012 is a make-or-break year for those of us who dreamed of another Packers dynasty. No one outside Pittsburgh considers the Steelers of 2005 and 2008 to be a dynasty. In fact, not even most Steelers fans call themselves a dynasty of the 2000s (they simply whine that they would have won every Super Bowl during the 2000s if not for those pesky officials!). The Patriots failed miserably in 2002, but they bounced back to win back-to-back titles in 2003 and 2004. If the Packers are to be remembered as a dynasty and not just a good team, they need to win it all next year. Else we might be looking back at these years the same way we look back at the late 90s - as missed opportunities to have a dynasty. That's why I literally cried after the loss on Sunday, the same way I did after the Super Bowl XXXII loss. Because everything pointed to it being "our year." (Then again I'm a loser who has nothing else going for him besides the Packers.) My theme for 2011 was "glory" - we failed at achieving that. My theme for 2012 is "redemption." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
gopkrs
Latest posts
R
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: rmontro
47 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 1:15 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: AKCheese
Today at 12:51 AM
Draft Talk
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: milani
Today at 12:23 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 12:11 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
NFL Discussions
Looking ahead to 2012
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top