. My goal is to have healthy, stimulating debate without all the nonsense.
I'm waiting.
Yeah I've been involved in nonsense, it's been such a long time, but dont act like you havent, Mr. Martyr.
. My goal is to have healthy, stimulating debate without all the nonsense.
dd80forever said:. My goal is to have healthy, stimulating debate without all the nonsense.
I'm waiting.
Yeah I've been involved in nonsense, it's been such a long time, but dont act like you havent, Mr. Martyr.
porky88 said:Anubis said:evad04 said:Those who side with Favre (and thus despise our G.M. TT) generally lack the cohesive argumentative focus that the other side -- the pro-Packer side seems to place a premium.
Really now...
To agree that Favre is our best shot for a Super Bowl in 2008, is wanted back by both his teammates and fans alike, and that TT should welcome him back with open arms isn't a cohesive arguement? How about the fact A-Rod has not been able to play an entire game in his limited time on the field without suffering serious injury, and if and when this happens, or backup plan is an unproven rookie straight out of college who has never taken a snap at the pro level? What is inheirantly incorrect about the two points I made above?
I would genuinely like to see the "cohesive arguement" against bringing Favre back that isn't a pro-TT circle jerk (which unfortunately, is all you get 85% of the time on this forum).
Any takers?
Aaron Rodgers has been committed to playing for the 2008 Green Bay Packers since Lawrence Tynes kicked the game winning field goal in overtime that ended the Green Bay Packers 2007 season.
Brett Favre hasn't.
So was Shaun Bodiford, then they went out and drafted Jordy Nelson. I guess by your logic, Shaun Bodiford should be on the depth chart ahead of Nelson. Correct?
I will respond since my name was thrown in on the thread.. I do think it wrong for anyone to namecall against another member, that is unless it is unmistakeable in jest.. I wish no one to be banned nor leave the forum for any reason related to such acts.
I find it a sign of weakness or lack of argument to throw out name calling just because you can't see or at the very least respect anothers viewpoint.. however off kilter from your own.
On topic.. if Favre, Rodgers and TT can co-exist.. it is the superior option for the Packers overall.. if either Favre or Rodgers plays upon the field.. but apparently that may be a struggle for some.