Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Lions - Studs and Duds
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 978052"><p>Thompson was in charge of the Packers drafts from 2010-17, therefore it doesn't make any sense to include those years when evaluating Gutekunst. </p><p></p><p>Below you can find a list of teams rankings based on Pro Football Reference's approximate value accumulated for the team that drafted those players since 2018 (I understand it's not a perfect metric at all but I don't have any better to come up with).</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]18706[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>According to those numbers the Packers have been an average team in the draft since 2018. There's no doubt Gutekunst has had success early in his tenure but starting with his miserable draft in 2020 they only rank 24th in that category. Considering the rookie class this year seems to be underwhelming as well the team might drop even further in that list.</p><p></p><p>Therefore it's not correct to consider them one of the best in the league at selecting prospects. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I highly doubt the Packers would try to recoup any of the money having been paid to Rodgers this year if he retires after the season.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 6794, post: 978052"] Thompson was in charge of the Packers drafts from 2010-17, therefore it doesn't make any sense to include those years when evaluating Gutekunst. Below you can find a list of teams rankings based on Pro Football Reference's approximate value accumulated for the team that drafted those players since 2018 (I understand it's not a perfect metric at all but I don't have any better to come up with). [ATTACH type="full"]18706[/ATTACH] According to those numbers the Packers have been an average team in the draft since 2018. There's no doubt Gutekunst has had success early in his tenure but starting with his miserable draft in 2020 they only rank 24th in that category. Considering the rookie class this year seems to be underwhelming as well the team might drop even further in that list. Therefore it's not correct to consider them one of the best in the league at selecting prospects. I highly doubt the Packers would try to recoup any of the money having been paid to Rodgers this year if he retires after the season. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
edensmage
Latest posts
S
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Schultz
Today at 7:33 PM
Draft Talk
S
If you were GM, what is your ideal draft?
Latest: Schultz
Today at 7:27 PM
Draft Talk
Free Agency Thread
Latest: Dantés
Today at 7:07 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: weeds
Today at 6:59 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Dark Horse Candidates
Latest: edensmage
Today at 6:50 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Lions - Studs and Duds
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top