Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="IPBprez" data-source="post: 19035" data-attributes="member: 51">The comparison, "66" - was about (specifically) Brett's constant INT percentages.... and nothing more.If Brett throws at least three (or more) INT's in just about every game, all bets are off and he might as well retire admitting he's lost it.  I have commented endlessly about Favre needing to get back to the fundamentals he had while under Mike Holmgren's tutelage - go back and see what his INT percentages were back then....   There's certainly no mistake why we were SuperBowl contenders during that time - no other Defenses could ever get their hands on the ball - no turnovers, period.Knowing this one item is a hot point for the Team - then having Rodgers in there wouldn't really be any different of an end result, now would it......  'course not.   Hence the comment.  Brett's QB rating against the Pats was tragic - you know that, I know that.  It needs to stop, or else.  He simply MUST pay attention to his fundamental reads and follow thru's.. lay off and go another route, quit forcing the big play and go for the bucket instead.  Remember, that Driver pass in the end zone against Buffalo could have gone the other way....  Driver's been stripped before, ya know.  Remember, the Colts game - it can happen at any time.</blockquote>

Total: 630 (members: 3, guests: 627)