Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Let's look at Offense - consider Transitional Players, too!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="IPBprez" data-source="post: 19029" data-attributes="member: 51"><p>from PackerChatters - </p><p></p><p><img src="http://www.packerchatters.com/images/fangb.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p><em>by LosAngelis</em> </p><p>PackerChatters Staff</p><p><span style="color: yellow">Thursday, August 25, 2005</span></p><p><span style="color: yellow"><span style="font-size: 26px"><strong>"Transitional" Players</strong></span></span></p><p><span style="color: yellow"><span style="font-size: 26px">I like the Franks signing, because I see him as an important transitional player between the ending of the Favre era and the start of the Rodgers* era.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: yellow"><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: yellow"><span style="font-size: 26px">The end of the Favre era could be the end of this year, or more likely the end of 2006. Maybe further, but I doubt it.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: yellow"><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: yellow"><span style="font-size: 26px">I do not see Green as being as important of a transitional player. As much as I love him, three-four years from now, I don't see him being able to contribute as he has.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: yellow"><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: yellow"><span style="font-size: 26px">I see Walker and Fergie as important transitional players, but due to Driver's age, he may not be as key.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: yellow"><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: yellow"><span style="font-size: 26px">Obviously, Tauscher and Clifton probably factor into being an important transitional players, but Flanagan probably do not.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: yellow"><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: yellow"><span style="font-size: 26px">So, offensively, the players I would hope to see three years from now surrounding Rodgers* would be:</span></span></p><p><span style="color: yellow"><span style="font-size: 26px"> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><br /> Walker<br /> Ferguson<br /> Franks<br /> Tauscher<br /> Clifton</li> </ul><p>Not including Green, Davenport, or Fisher bothers me. Is this a need once Favre retires, or should one of these guys be considered important pieces of the future?</span></span></p><p><span style="color: yellow"><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: yellow"><span style="font-size: 26px">Obviously, we could make a list of such players on defense, but I was looking mostly at offense right now. Defense still seems to be in a bit of flux..hard to say who we would want three years from now, other than perhaps Barnett.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: yellow"><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: yellow"><span style="font-size: 26px">To me, the definition of a "transitional" player is a proven solid starter or contributor that is young enough to continue a high level of play over the next four years.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: yellow"><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: yellow"><span style="font-size: 26px">Just thought I'd throw it out.</span></span></p><p></p><p>==============================</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">I would add he forgot Murphy, who will become a starter and a transitional... Not sure Walker will be around next year, tho'</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">On Defense, which will be reviewed later on... He should remember Collins & Cole will be here, along with Barnett.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px">IPBprez</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="IPBprez, post: 19029, member: 51"] from PackerChatters - [img]http://www.packerchatters.com/images/fangb.gif[/img] [i]by LosAngelis[/i] PackerChatters Staff [color=yellow]Thursday, August 25, 2005 [size=7][b]"Transitional" Players[/b][/size] [size=7]I like the Franks signing, because I see him as an important transitional player between the ending of the Favre era and the start of the Rodgers* era. The end of the Favre era could be the end of this year, or more likely the end of 2006. Maybe further, but I doubt it. I do not see Green as being as important of a transitional player. As much as I love him, three-four years from now, I don't see him being able to contribute as he has. I see Walker and Fergie as important transitional players, but due to Driver's age, he may not be as key. Obviously, Tauscher and Clifton probably factor into being an important transitional players, but Flanagan probably do not. So, offensively, the players I would hope to see three years from now surrounding Rodgers* would be: [list] Walker Ferguson Franks Tauscher Clifton [/list] Not including Green, Davenport, or Fisher bothers me. Is this a need once Favre retires, or should one of these guys be considered important pieces of the future? Obviously, we could make a list of such players on defense, but I was looking mostly at offense right now. Defense still seems to be in a bit of flux..hard to say who we would want three years from now, other than perhaps Barnett. To me, the definition of a "transitional" player is a proven solid starter or contributor that is young enough to continue a high level of play over the next four years. Just thought I'd throw it out.[/size][/color] ============================== [size=7]I would add he forgot Murphy, who will become a starter and a transitional... Not sure Walker will be around next year, tho' On Defense, which will be reviewed later on... He should remember Collins & Cole will be here, along with Barnett. IPBprez[/size] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
ExpatPacker
Latest posts
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: ExpatPacker
14 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Prospects you are A LOT higher on than consensus…
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 1:19 AM
Draft Talk
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: PackFan2
Yesterday at 8:28 PM
Draft Talk
Anyone watching the UFL?
Latest: Voyageur
Yesterday at 4:49 PM
Fantasy Football
The Packers All-Personality Team
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 4:37 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Let's look at Offense - consider Transitional Players, too!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top