I respectfully disagree here. I think there is a solid case to make for Butler, which mainly rests on being voted to the Hall Of Fame's All-1990s team, and his four All-Pro years (which, it should be noted, were consensus All-Pro years; for the sake of comparison, the only other Packers with four or more consensus years are Hutson, Ringo, Gregg and Davis). Those are the kind of accolades that put him way above players like Levens and Green, who will never seriously enter in to these types of HoF conversations. The fact that King has mentioned Butler bodes well for addressing the lack of safeties in the Hall, imo. There will be some stiff competition in the years ahead, namely from the likes of Polamalu, Dawkins and Reed, but I think Butler will have a decent chance at some point in the future. (They'll look at his sack and INT totals as well, obviously, and I wouldn't dismiss all of his other non-All-Pro/Pro Bowl years as non-factors. For example, he made some really clutch plays during the '95 season, and led the team in tackles.)