NJPackfan..
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2017
- Messages
- 134
- Reaction score
- 3
If there is any truth to it, the author states Adams and a draft pick. Which does have some merit. If the Packers are thinking they aren't going to be able to resign Adams and there is enough talent below him to slide the depth chart up a notch, it makes perfect sense.
I don't think we can run block well enough to let McCoy show what he can do. Great back but no one can run when there are no holes. That has got to be on Campen.
I agree with you, not on the surface anyway. But what if you are in the Packer organization and already know you probably aren't going to try and resign Adams after this year? Again, I wouldn't favor trading Adams, unless he has a one season shelf life in GB AND they believe Allison or someone else can adequately fill his shoes.With the Packers predicated on the passing offense I wouldn´t consider trading Adams and a pick for McCoy to be a smart move.
I agree with you, not on the surface anyway. But what if you are in the Packer organization and already know you probably aren't going to try and resign Adams after this year?
Shady would be godlike in this offense though, I'll say that.
If you do a Google search for "LeSean McCoy trade rumors", there is plenty of people writing about it, but most of what is written is saying he won't be traded.I gotta figure the article is either fake or just totally wrong.
Well god-like would certainly be ideal next to "Godgers".Shady would be godlike in this offense though, I'll say that.
Definitely something to help pass the time until week 1.If you do a Google search for "LeSean McCoy trade rumors", there is plenty of people writing about it, but most of what is written is saying he won't be traded.
Again, fun water cooler talk, much like Seattle trading away Richard Sherman earlier this year. This thread will hit 3-4 pages soon.
I don't think GB tends to tip their hand with what they're going to do too often, but I would be surprised if they've decided that Adams can't be or won't be re-signed. I mean it could happen, but I do believe they really like him. Every indication from the FO and the players leads me to believe he is in their long term plans. I guess that's never stopped me from being wrong before, but I'm not buying this report at all.
I highly doubt the Packers are currently expecting to lose Adams after the 2017 season in free agency.
TT likes to develop guys and if he sees a cheaper option out of one of his draft picks or UDFA's, then I wouldn't put it past him to let Adams walk next year.....but trading him AND a draft pick? Is that in TT's DNA?