Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Last 2 Packer SB teams vs each other
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PackersRS" data-source="post: 369169" data-attributes="member: 1429"><p>The 96' team was much better in the regular season. It was the most dominant regular season Packers team I've seen.</p><p> </p><p>The 10' team was much better in the postseason. It was the most dominant postseason Packer team I've seen.</p><p></p><p>And it affects in specific areas.</p><p></p><p>Favre was a much better regular season QB in 96' than Rodgers was in 10', no comparison. But Rodgers was much better in the postseason than Favre was. In fact, Rodgers had arguably the greatest postseason a QB has ever had.</p><p></p><p>Same for the coaches. Holmgren wins in a landslide comparing the regular season. But IMHO MM was phenomenal in the postseason, maybe better than Holmgren was.</p><p></p><p>BTW, Vandermause forgot to compare coaching staff. IMHO Holmgren was a better coach than McCarthy is, but, no offense to Fritz Shurmur, Dom Capers is in another level. Lewis and Philbin are more behind the curtains guys, with both MM and Holmgren taking active roles in offensive playcalling. I don't need to mention ST, right? We had a coach in 96, we didn't in 10. (Here's hoping Slocum has the performance of his life in 11')</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PackersRS, post: 369169, member: 1429"] The 96' team was much better in the regular season. It was the most dominant regular season Packers team I've seen. The 10' team was much better in the postseason. It was the most dominant postseason Packer team I've seen. And it affects in specific areas. Favre was a much better regular season QB in 96' than Rodgers was in 10', no comparison. But Rodgers was much better in the postseason than Favre was. In fact, Rodgers had arguably the greatest postseason a QB has ever had. Same for the coaches. Holmgren wins in a landslide comparing the regular season. But IMHO MM was phenomenal in the postseason, maybe better than Holmgren was. BTW, Vandermause forgot to compare coaching staff. IMHO Holmgren was a better coach than McCarthy is, but, no offense to Fritz Shurmur, Dom Capers is in another level. Lewis and Philbin are more behind the curtains guys, with both MM and Holmgren taking active roles in offensive playcalling. I don't need to mention ST, right? We had a coach in 96, we didn't in 10. (Here's hoping Slocum has the performance of his life in 11') [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
AKCheese
Latest posts
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: milani
17 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: gopkrs
19 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
28 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 255 (compensatory): Kalen King, CB
Latest: Dantés
Yesterday at 10:42 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 6, pick 202: Travis Glover, OT
Latest: Dantés
Yesterday at 10:35 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Last 2 Packer SB teams vs each other
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top