1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!

    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers. You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
    Dismiss Notice

KGB

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by JbShell, Aug 25, 2006.

  1. JbShell

    JbShell Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Messages:
    796
    Ratings:
    +0
    Since he seems to get locked in blocks how bout put him on the o-line

    haha Good idea no??
     
  2. BoydAvery

    BoydAvery Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2006
    Messages:
    98
    Ratings:
    +0
    How about making him a 3rd down pass rusher?
     
  3. JbShell

    JbShell Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Messages:
    796
    Ratings:
    +0
    yeah would be a better fit he cannot defend the run.
     
  4. musccy

    musccy Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    1,854
    Ratings:
    +1
    how 'bout we make him a punt returner or a bench warmer...he'd be about as productive at that as he is now at DE
     
  5. cyoung

    cyoung Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,276
    Ratings:
    +2
    He does good but teams dont run to the left enough so Kampman is reeling in more tackles, if they were switched we'd see the difference.
     
  6. slackerbacker

    slackerbacker Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Messages:
    228
    Ratings:
    +0
    Well like him or not he finished ranked 47th in 2003, 43rd in 2004 and 40th in 2005 among NFL DEs and he's still the best pass rusher we have. While he may not be what we'd like him to be, he certainly has been productive and is more than serviciable. Personally, I think he's a hell of a player and more than any of us thought he'd be as a 5th rd draft pick. He hustles, is of high charactor and makes plays all over the field; I don't know what else some of you expect. Did you expect him to turn down the extra money Sherman offered him??

    Funny thing is, whenever I/someone mentions possibly trading him and letting one of TT's rookies take over, everyone throws a hissy over that as well. So once again, so many GB can't seem to make up their minds. If we're rebuilding as many of you suggest, why not trade him iand his contract??
     
  7. cheesey

    cheesey Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2005
    Messages:
    1,000
    Ratings:
    +3
    Alot of good points..........he IS a good pass rusher WHEN he goes up against a guy that he can beat with his speed. Now, with the new linebackers, maybe this will also help him. The Pack seems to have alot of speed with Hawk and Hodge, (and of course Barnett) and Poppinga could add to this. He's got his motor running all the time.
     
  8. musccy

    musccy Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    1,854
    Ratings:
    +1
    like cheesy said, he's a one trick pony and might as well not be on the field unless he's facing someone who's too slow to catch a parked bus. KGB will have 3-4 games where he racks up all of his stats, but is then seemingly absent the rest of the season.
     
  9. dhpackr

    dhpackr Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Messages:
    1,635
    Ratings:
    +0
    KGB should be a third down situational pass rusher, not an ever down player.

    I'd like to see Montgomery start in front of KGB on first and second down.

    Anybody hear anything about kenny peterson's pre-season camp? Is peterson still a member of the Packers?

    DE is a weakness on GB. Kampman is decent, but KGB is an one-dimensional player. he is a speed rushing end,who gets lOW AND COMES OFF THE END QUICKLY. but if he can't beat a tackle w/his first move he is going to be blocked.
     
  10. dhpackr

    dhpackr Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Messages:
    1,635
    Ratings:
    +0
    you think hodge is fast??
     
  11. dhpackr

    dhpackr Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Messages:
    1,635
    Ratings:
    +0
    huh??
     
  12. cyoung

    cyoung Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,276
    Ratings:
    +2
    ok I said normally they'll run back near Kampman than to KGB
     
  13. dhpackr

    dhpackr Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Messages:
    1,635
    Ratings:
    +0
    you think teams run at kampman instead of KGB??
     
  14. kmac

    kmac Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2006
    Messages:
    849
    Ratings:
    +0
    Teams don't run to 1 side more than the other. Kampman just happens to be a fantastic run-stopping DE.
     
  15. dhpackr

    dhpackr Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Messages:
    1,635
    Ratings:
    +0
    umm, what side did seattle's shaun alexander run on and score most of his TD's on and why??
     
  16. thetombradyhater

    thetombradyhater Cheesehead

    Joined:
    May 5, 2006
    Messages:
    990
    Ratings:
    +0
    the left the left the left!
     
  17. dhpackr

    dhpackr Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Messages:
    1,635
    Ratings:
    +0
    exactly, a clear cut example of a team running to a certain side.

    ever hear of a play called "the packer sweep"?
     
  18. pyledriver80

    pyledriver80 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    May 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,391
    Ratings:
    +0

    Are you serious? Of course they do!
     
  19. kmac

    kmac Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2006
    Messages:
    849
    Ratings:
    +0
    I seriously doubt that NFL coaches are so dumb as to run at Kampman significantly more than KGB.
     
  20. dhpackr

    dhpackr Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Messages:
    1,635
    Ratings:
    +0
    ROFLMAO,are you slow? do you even watch games? can i play poker w/you?

    We are saying teams run at KGB NOT KAMPMAN!!!!!!!!!!!
     

Share This Page