Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Keeping 53 could be Pack’s problem
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wpr" data-source="post: 95025" data-attributes="member: 198"><p>Trom I usually enjoy reading your posts. I agree with your comments some of the time. I also disagree w/ you on other occasions.</p><p>this time I am more in the middle based on your comments.</p><p></p><p>I have read Reed's work for years. He is not like some of the columnists who like to sensationalize their articles and try and churn up trash. I think he is trying hard to say good things about GB. A writer you is trying to burn a team would not use words like "to be fair" or " there is an explanation" and "there is potential (for GB) to be better"</p><p></p><p>I think he is trying to point out that to no one's surprise GB needs depth.</p><p></p><p>As far as not commenting on the missing DB's I don't think it was his intent to comment position by position for the entire preseason. He was speaking in general that the team is young and they need more help. His comment is, and I think even you can agree with it, unless they get a whole lot better don't look for them in the Super Bowl.</p><p>One of Reed's main points was </p><p>So I ask you- Does GB have 53 players that can play on every other NFL team? I don't think so. Once you get past the 22 starters and let's say another 20 or so back ups you will find guys who are very raw talent wise.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wpr, post: 95025, member: 198"] Trom I usually enjoy reading your posts. I agree with your comments some of the time. I also disagree w/ you on other occasions. this time I am more in the middle based on your comments. I have read Reed's work for years. He is not like some of the columnists who like to sensationalize their articles and try and churn up trash. I think he is trying hard to say good things about GB. A writer you is trying to burn a team would not use words like "to be fair" or " there is an explanation" and "there is potential (for GB) to be better" I think he is trying to point out that to no one's surprise GB needs depth. As far as not commenting on the missing DB's I don't think it was his intent to comment position by position for the entire preseason. He was speaking in general that the team is young and they need more help. His comment is, and I think even you can agree with it, unless they get a whole lot better don't look for them in the Super Bowl. One of Reed's main points was So I ask you- Does GB have 53 players that can play on every other NFL team? I don't think so. Once you get past the 22 starters and let's say another 20 or so back ups you will find guys who are very raw talent wise. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
DoURant
tynimiller
Latest posts
2025 NFL Schedule Release
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
3 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Is it time?
Latest: OldSchool101
42 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Sean Rhyan missed out on $2 mil bonus by 3 snaps
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 2:48 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 Roster - Semi Live Thread
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 2:44 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
NFC North Predictions
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 2:42 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Keeping 53 could be Pack’s problem
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top