Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 878370">The point is simply that the adjusted numbers show how often a team like the Packers (and the league in general) will call (or adible to) passing plays vs. runs.  It gives a clearer picture of the predominance of the passing game, Baltimore being a notable outlier.Getting to the Packers numbers are easy because of the very few called runs by the QB.  For the few QBs known to run on purpose a fair amount, Jackson again being the outlier, you can't look at the stat sheet and differntiate runs and scrambles.Anyway, going from 58/42 to 53/47 (uncorrected) is about 3 plays moved from the pass column to the run column in a typical game.  I don't see that as huge difference.  It might move the Packers up 10 slots in the rankings of run percentage, but on an absolute basis it would not be all that noticeable.  That might be one of those all too common ranking falacies where small differences are exaggerated.</blockquote>

Total: 1,023 (members: 3, guests: 1,020)