just a reminder that the packers can be good.

[tromadz]

Hey, the Steelers (Super Bowl Champs) just went 0-4 in the preseason.

That must mean they're gonna suck in the regular season!! OH NO!

:Faints:

 

[all about da packers]

:Faints:

Prayers do come true! :wink:

But seriously, does this mean that..... you're a closet Steelers fan? :-?

Hey, the Steelers (Super Bowl Champs) just went 0-4 in the preseason.

To be fair, they were without the best WR on the team.

 

[tromadz]

:Faints:

Prayers do come true! :wink:

What, you want to take advantage of me while I'm passed out? I knew a guy like that in high school. He lives in Joliet now and has a rommate named "Porterhouse"

 

[all about da packers]

:Faints:

Prayers do come true! :wink:

What, you want to take advantage of me while I'm passed out?

Er is that even possible seeing as I'm all the way over here in Toronto?

 

[packerfan4ever]

well to me preseason is to find out what you have in players,and how they will play at their position,changes have to be made that is why some players are cut

 

[Blackjackking]

Hey, the Steelers (Super Bowl Champs) just went 0-4 in the preseason.

Please don't compare the Packers to the Steelers. The Steelers are good and the Packers are bad! Plain and simple.

 

[tromadz]

based off preseason

that makes sense....


no, it doesnt.

 

[BoydAvery]

You guys don't get it. Nobody said the win/loss record mattered in preseason. It is how the teams play and how prepared they are. If week one and week three don't concern you.....check your pulse! The only game we looked decent was week two when Atlanta didn't play their starters very long and ours went into the third quarter. And we got about 3 or 4 lucky bounces. If you remember, Atlanta drove right down the field with their first team. I couldn't care less about our preseason record but this is the worst I've seen a Packer team play in the preseason. I'm a little concerned, sorry.

Wow, I can't believe DePack wrote that.

 

[CaliforniaCheez]

Whatever the questions are, Aaron Rodgers is not the answer.

If this guy could only get a first down once in a while, throw away the ball once in a while, run a 2 minute offence just once.

The coaching staff should use flogging to teach this kid something about football.

Why can't he learn and stop repeating his foolish mistakes??????

Ted thompson blew it drafting him. A bust is a bust is a bust.

Trade him by tomorrow. Don't cut him with nothing gained in return.

 

[tromadz]

are you crazy? he had the backup line with him!

While I dont like his fumbling, when he gets a good line with him, you seen he can do ok. I love the overracting on pf.com

 

[calicheesehead]

Whatever the questions are, Aaron Rodgers is not the answer.

Couldn't agree more. Look at one receiver, then run....What a talent. 2nd string OL, 1st string OL, not much difference, especially considerring they're going against the 2nd string DL.

Warhawk-Not much to disagree with your statements-they're true however, it goes hand in hand with what I'm saying. Sure our minimal game plan changes once we're down from the word go, however, doesn't change the fact that our players need to be playing their butts off even more so.