Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jones at ILB?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 726708"><p>I know. You mentioned the 60-some passer rating under "pressure". And as I noted earlier, by definition, that passer rating is limited to hits and hurries. Sacks cannot be included by definition since the ball was not thrown.</p><p></p><p>Following on an earlier exchange, how do you get to equivalency of sacks to hit/hurry passer rating? Let's look at a couple of examples.</p><p></p><p>Let's say you generate 40 sacks as the Packers did last season. And lets say, theoretically, all of those sacks were for zero yards with no strip recoveries. That's theoretical because if they were for zero yards they'd not be credited as sacks, but that's not relevant to the point.</p><p></p><p>In that case the, the passer rating equivalent would be 40, i.e., the same as a QB going 0-40 with no INTs and, of course, no yards or TDs.</p><p></p><p>If they were for negative yards in the aggregate, which of course they must be, the passer rating is still 40; the passer rating is designed for some meaningful number of throws and does not contemplate a passer having net negative yards. Regardless, the lost yards create an equivalency of less than a 40 passer rating in their value.</p><p></p><p>Further, if you generate just one strip sack recovery out of those 40 sacks, considering it an INT equivalent, then the equivalent passer rating drops to 29. Two strip sack recoveries...it drops to 19. And, again, that includes zero credit for the negative yards in those 40 sacks.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 726708"] I know. You mentioned the 60-some passer rating under "pressure". And as I noted earlier, by definition, that passer rating is limited to hits and hurries. Sacks cannot be included by definition since the ball was not thrown. Following on an earlier exchange, how do you get to equivalency of sacks to hit/hurry passer rating? Let's look at a couple of examples. Let's say you generate 40 sacks as the Packers did last season. And lets say, theoretically, all of those sacks were for zero yards with no strip recoveries. That's theoretical because if they were for zero yards they'd not be credited as sacks, but that's not relevant to the point. In that case the, the passer rating equivalent would be 40, i.e., the same as a QB going 0-40 with no INTs and, of course, no yards or TDs. If they were for negative yards in the aggregate, which of course they must be, the passer rating is still 40; the passer rating is designed for some meaningful number of throws and does not contemplate a passer having net negative yards. Regardless, the lost yards create an equivalency of less than a 40 passer rating in their value. Further, if you generate just one strip sack recovery out of those 40 sacks, considering it an INT equivalent, then the equivalent passer rating drops to 29. Two strip sack recoveries...it drops to 19. And, again, that includes zero credit for the negative yards in those 40 sacks. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
The General
weeds
shockerx
Latest posts
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
Yesterday at 8:07 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 6:14 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 5:41 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 3:06 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: mradtke66
Yesterday at 2:30 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jones at ILB?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
