Pugger
Cheesehead
Unfortunately we had to use Nelson as a returner out of necessity. Let's hope we aren't forced into that kind of situation again this season!
The one thing I like about Nelson and his return game is he just goes forward instead of doing that dancing crap most return men do.
What games were you watching? The moment someone came near him he would just stop his feet. Try and move side-to-side with no effect, and crumble to the ground. Or he might just fumble it like he did in Detroit on thanksgiving.
HE CAN'T RETURN ANYTHING
Worst returner ever
I know Teddy has made some great personnel moves, great draft picks.
But one reason why he's only had 1 playoff game win in 6 years is because he's also had some bad personnel moves.
You are what your record is, and playoffs are where the measuring stick is.
In the 2008 Draft, Cal WR DeSean Jackson was rated very high in the experts rankings, and of the 5 magazines I have, he was rated ahead of Kansas State Ed McCaffrey clone Jordy Nelson.
So it was a surprise in round 2 that year when the Packers selected Jordy Nelson with Jackson still on board, leaving the Eagles the smaller playmaker who has boosted their special teams as well as electrifying their passing game.
This isn't 20/20 hindsight because you'd be hardpressed to find any experts ratings from that draft who had Nelson ahead of Jackson.
Example: Here are some ratings pre-draft from 2008.
WalterFootball is one of the best, and he rated DeSean Jackson as the #1 WR in that draft, which D-Jack has backed up:
#1You must be logged in to see this image or video!DeSean Jackson, California
Height: 5-9. Weight: 169.
Projected 40 Time: 4.32.
Combine 40 Time: 4.31.
Vertical: 34.5. Broad 10-2.
Projected Round: Top 25 Pick.
Some teams will shy away from DeSean Jackson because of his size. Those same teams probably passed up on Steve Smith (5-9, 185) too. Still, you have to wonder why Jackson hasn't been able to put on any weight during his collegiate career.
Jackson snapped out of his early-season slump, catching 11 passes for 160 yards and two touchdowns in an upset at Oregon.
Compared to Santana Moss. Returned four punts for touchdowns in 2006. There's talk that Jackson may run a 4.2, which would put him into the top five. He's the same size as Ted Ginn, and could be even faster. Jackson recorded 59 receptions, 1,060 yards and nine scores last year.
#9You must be logged in to see this image or video!Jordy Nelson, Kansas StateYou must be logged in to see this image or video!
Height: 6-2. Weight: 217.
Projected 40 Time: 4.54.
Combine 40 Time: 4.49.
Vertical: 31. Broad .
Projected Round: 2-3.
I was glad to see Jordy Nelson follow up a solid Senior Bowl with a 4.49 at the combine. He could sneak into the second round.
From FootballsFuture:
2008 NFL Draft WR Rankings
Wide Receiver
- Malcolm Kelly, Oklahoma
- DeSean Jackson, Cal
- James Hardy, Indiana
- Limas Sweed, Texas
- Devin Thomas, Michigan St.
- Mario Manningham, Michigan
- Earl Bennett, WR, Vanderbilt
- Donnie Avery, WR, Houston
- Harry Douglas, Louisville
- Andre Caldwell, Florida
The War Room Report
2008 NFL Draft WR Rankings - The War Room Report
1. Devin Thomas*, Michigan State, 6-2, 216, 4.40
2. Limas Sweed, Texas, 6-4, 219, 4.52
3. Desean Jackson*, Cal, 5-10, 169, 4.35
4. James Hardy*, Indiana, 6-5, 217, 4.51
5. Malcolm Kelly*, Oklahoma, 6-4, 224
6. Mario Manningham*, Michigan, 5-11, 181, 4.60
7. Early Doucet, LSU, 6-0, 209
8. Earl Bennett*, Vanderbilt, 5-11, 209, 4.48
9. Lavelle Hawkins, Cal, 5-11, 187, 4.52
10. Andre Caldwell, Florida, 6-0, 204, 4.37
11. Jordy Nelson, Kansas State, 6-3, 217, 4.51
RIVALS.com Frank Coyle
Rivals.com NFL Draft - NFL Draft: 2008 Wide Receiver Rankings
This year's wide receiver group is an above-average class. There are a half dozen juniors who expect to be selected in the top 100 choices.
Underclassman DeSean Jackson may be the first player selected at this position in the middle of the first round. There could be three No. 1 picks with prospects like Limas Sweed and Early Doucet coming off strong performances at the NFL Combine and others like James Hardy and Malcolm Kelly boasting prototype NFL size and speed.
DeSean Jackson, 5-11, 165, California
This all-purpose playmaker can be an impact performer as both a receiver and return specialist. He burned up the track at the Combine - as expected - and may be the top prospect selected at this position.
#16. Jordy Nelson, 6-2, 215, Kansas State
I know Teddy has made some great personnel moves, great draft picks.
But one reason why he's only had 1 playoff game win in 6 years is because he's also had some bad personnel moves.
You are what your record is, and playoffs are where the measuring stick is.
In the 2008 Draft, Cal WR DeSean Jackson was rated very high in the experts rankings, and of the 5 magazines I have, he was rated ahead of Kansas State Ed McCaffrey clone Jordy Nelson.
So it was a surprise in round 2 that year when the Packers selected Jordy Nelson with Jackson still on board, leaving the Eagles the smaller playmaker who has boosted their special teams as well as electrifying their passing game.
This isn't 20/20 hindsight because you'd be hardpressed to find any experts ratings from that draft who had Nelson ahead of Jackson.
Example: Here are some ratings pre-draft from 2008.
WalterFootball is one of the best, and he rated DeSean Jackson as the #1 WR in that draft, which D-Jack has backed up:
#1You must be logged in to see this image or video!DeSean Jackson, California
Height: 5-9. Weight: 169.
Projected 40 Time: 4.32.
Combine 40 Time: 4.31.
Vertical: 34.5. Broad 10-2.
Projected Round: Top 25 Pick.
Some teams will shy away from DeSean Jackson because of his size. Those same teams probably passed up on Steve Smith (5-9, 185) too. Still, you have to wonder why Jackson hasn't been able to put on any weight during his collegiate career.
Jackson snapped out of his early-season slump, catching 11 passes for 160 yards and two touchdowns in an upset at Oregon.
Compared to Santana Moss. Returned four punts for touchdowns in 2006. There's talk that Jackson may run a 4.2, which would put him into the top five. He's the same size as Ted Ginn, and could be even faster. Jackson recorded 59 receptions, 1,060 yards and nine scores last year.
#9You must be logged in to see this image or video!Jordy Nelson, Kansas StateYou must be logged in to see this image or video!
Height: 6-2. Weight: 217.
Projected 40 Time: 4.54.
Combine 40 Time: 4.49.
Vertical: 31. Broad .
Projected Round: 2-3.
I was glad to see Jordy Nelson follow up a solid Senior Bowl with a 4.49 at the combine. He could sneak into the second round.
From FootballsFuture:
2008 NFL Draft WR Rankings
Wide Receiver
- Malcolm Kelly, Oklahoma
- DeSean Jackson, Cal
- James Hardy, Indiana
- Limas Sweed, Texas
- Devin Thomas, Michigan St.
- Mario Manningham, Michigan
- Earl Bennett, WR, Vanderbilt
- Donnie Avery, WR, Houston
- Harry Douglas, Louisville
- Andre Caldwell, Florida
The War Room Report
2008 NFL Draft WR Rankings - The War Room Report
1. Devin Thomas*, Michigan State, 6-2, 216, 4.40
2. Limas Sweed, Texas, 6-4, 219, 4.52
3. Desean Jackson*, Cal, 5-10, 169, 4.35
4. James Hardy*, Indiana, 6-5, 217, 4.51
5. Malcolm Kelly*, Oklahoma, 6-4, 224
6. Mario Manningham*, Michigan, 5-11, 181, 4.60
7. Early Doucet, LSU, 6-0, 209
8. Earl Bennett*, Vanderbilt, 5-11, 209, 4.48
9. Lavelle Hawkins, Cal, 5-11, 187, 4.52
10. Andre Caldwell, Florida, 6-0, 204, 4.37
11. Jordy Nelson, Kansas State, 6-3, 217, 4.51
RIVALS.com Frank Coyle
Rivals.com NFL Draft - NFL Draft: 2008 Wide Receiver Rankings
This year's wide receiver group is an above-average class. There are a half dozen juniors who expect to be selected in the top 100 choices.
Underclassman DeSean Jackson may be the first player selected at this position in the middle of the first round. There could be three No. 1 picks with prospects like Limas Sweed and Early Doucet coming off strong performances at the NFL Combine and others like James Hardy and Malcolm Kelly boasting prototype NFL size and speed.
DeSean Jackson, 5-11, 165, California
This all-purpose playmaker can be an impact performer as both a receiver and return specialist. He burned up the track at the Combine - as expected - and may be the top prospect selected at this position.
#16. Jordy Nelson, 6-2, 215, Kansas State
Oh I agree. I know people say hindsight is 20/20 but I also screamed for the packers to draft him. No one here needs to believe me, one of my good friends vouches whenever its brought up around friends as he was there during draft weekend when I was screaming he was the steal of the century.
But at this point its too late to complain about not drafting a probowler that was taken later in the draft.
That is great! If TT can continue to hit an impact player on 50% of his picks, he would be by far the Greatest GM of All Time!For every Clay Matthews, there's a Brian Brohm. For every Aaron Rodgers, there's a Pat Lee. For every Greg Jennings, there's a Cory Rodgers. For every Nick Collins, there's an Aaron Rouse here.
This thread was about Jordy, and about Jordy and DeSean Jackson. Are you telling me that me and Ivo were the only guys here who were mad WHEN THAT PICK WAS ANNOUNCED?
So should every topic just be reverted to the ole "Well TT's hit on Rodgers and Matthews so he's great".... ????
The bottom line in this business, this sport, are Super Bowls, and playoffs.
On that respect, which we call the bottom line, what grade would you give TT's overall body of work if he finishes his 6th season as team architect in 3 weeks, and we miss the playoffs and still only have one long playoff game win to show for it (over the crappy Seachickens who we have seen since then are terrible).
Honestly, I'd say his past performance is worthy of a C+. Some nice work in a few regular seasons. A couple terrible seasons. A single playoff win is par for the course as most teams have as much over the past 6 years.
What other picks did you know better than TT on?This thread was about Jordy, and about Jordy and DeSean Jackson. Are you telling me that me and Ivo were the only guys here who were mad WHEN THAT PICK WAS ANNOUNCED?
So should every topic just be reverted to the ole "Well TT's hit on Rodgers and Matthews so he's great".... ????
The bottom line in this business, this sport, are Super Bowls, and playoffs.
On that respect, which we call the bottom line, what grade would you give TT's overall body of work if he finishes his 6th season as team architect in 3 weeks, and we miss the playoffs and still only have one long playoff game win to show for it (over the crappy Seachickens who we have seen since then are terrible).
Honestly, I'd say his past performance is worthy of a C+. Some nice work in a few regular seasons. A couple terrible seasons. A single playoff win is par for the course as most teams have as much over the past 6 years.
Again, Ted has hit on some that I wouldn't have, and you wouldn't have.
And he's missed on some that you and I wouldn't have missed on.
Don't be afraid to call a spade a spade.
Now saying Ted deserves an A because the team he inherited SIX YEARS ago was old? That's pretty ignorant in today's NFL.
Teams can reload in 2, 3 years in today's NFL.
The Cardinals were always a laughing stock. But they got washed up, unwanted, discarded QB Kurt Warner, and they had a magical run to a Super Bowl one year, then the next year made the playoffs again and outscored us. That win over us was as many playoff wins as we have in Ted Thompson's tenure here.
And this will be the 3rd straight year someone else has won our division.
If you grade on results, and not feathered optimism and praise from the media, you can't honestly give him an A for that. He's THE MAN responsible for the results.
If you give that overall body of work, results, an A, I wish I had you has my teacher all thru school. I'd have had straight A's and been valedictorian.
You can't grade on future expectations.
How did this go from Jordy Nelson to a draft thread?