Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Jolly drug case reopened, could serve up to 20 years in prison
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DILLIGAFF" data-source="post: 261894" data-attributes="member: 1719"><p>The Packers defense is evolving and far superior to the one that went 4-4. Dom Capers play book has more than double since the last viking game. Vikings only have one player that they have lost to injury, other than that its the same starting line up since they played the Packers.</p><p> </p><p>The Packers however have both starting safety positions healthy and playing, Bigby was not playing and we were picking any decent safety we could off the street at the time. Collins was playing, but playing hurt. I bet BF would get a lot more pressure now that our secondary is solid. Barrnet was not at full strength and Raji was either not playing or only could go for 10 snaps or less in a limited role. Despite losing Kampman our out side LB play has gotten better as our rookies become more like season veterans. Hard to call them rookies when they have played 16 games. </p><p> </p><p>Even with our defenses going head to head, the biggest factor that has changed is our O-line. That by itself changes the whole field position and time of possession game, which the Pack lost badly both times we played. I still say if we had slightly better O-line play the Pack would have won one game at least.</p><p> </p><p>Those sacks put our defense in bad field position a number of times during those games.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DILLIGAFF, post: 261894, member: 1719"] The Packers defense is evolving and far superior to the one that went 4-4. Dom Capers play book has more than double since the last viking game. Vikings only have one player that they have lost to injury, other than that its the same starting line up since they played the Packers. The Packers however have both starting safety positions healthy and playing, Bigby was not playing and we were picking any decent safety we could off the street at the time. Collins was playing, but playing hurt. I bet BF would get a lot more pressure now that our secondary is solid. Barrnet was not at full strength and Raji was either not playing or only could go for 10 snaps or less in a limited role. Despite losing Kampman our out side LB play has gotten better as our rookies become more like season veterans. Hard to call them rookies when they have played 16 games. Even with our defenses going head to head, the biggest factor that has changed is our O-line. That by itself changes the whole field position and time of possession game, which the Pack lost badly both times we played. I still say if we had slightly better O-line play the Pack would have won one game at least. Those sacks put our defense in bad field position a number of times during those games. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Magooch
Latest posts
M
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: Magooch
3 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
24 minutes ago
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: milani
Today at 3:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Today at 3:44 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
Today at 3:40 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Jolly drug case reopened, could serve up to 20 years in prison
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top