Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Jimmy Graham's blocking
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 844471" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>In 2012 with NO Saints, Graham produced 982 yards and 10 TDs. His average reception was 11.6 per reception.</p><p>In 2018 Graham put up 636 yards. His average reception? 11.6 per reception. Yes, from a reception mark he’s “ok”. From a recent history view, he’s not great, he’s also not nearly as bad as you make him either. It’s typical of some impatient fans to write him off after 2 games in a new system (with a minor injury to boot) I think that’s way too premature and far to impatient this early in. I choose to judge players by their season, 1-2 games is a poor sample size.</p><p></p><p>First, you completely rewrote what I said, which is odd because you could’ve just “quoted” me, which would’ve been more appropriate if you’re making an argument about something you claim someone stated. Kinda odd way to present an argument and lends suspicion as to why you chose to change my statement? I have a hard enough time defending stupid stuff I say without defending stupid stuff i didn’t say! Anyway I’ll give you benefit of the doubt there <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/wink.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>Regardless. I don’t think us missing one underperforming player (Graham) implies Denver is going to be an “easy” victory. That’s quite a leap from me saying we can still win if Graham is not playing this week (if anything that could be implied as Denver is that good) It’s also not consistent with my larger thought process of how to go about winning games, so it wouldn’t ever be intentionally implied by me as it’s contrary to my macro philosophy. Id never underestimate my opponent, that’s a foolish way to prepare for any contest.</p><p></p><p> Now if I said we could win without Rodgers? Or if I said put Tim Boyle in there? That would more constitute the implication we can win “easy”.</p><p>Us Winning without Graham this week at home? With this Defense? You don’t need to discount the Denver Broncos or be a Prophet in a foreign land to make that connection.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 844471, member: 10086"] In 2012 with NO Saints, Graham produced 982 yards and 10 TDs. His average reception was 11.6 per reception. In 2018 Graham put up 636 yards. His average reception? 11.6 per reception. Yes, from a reception mark he’s “ok”. From a recent history view, he’s not great, he’s also not nearly as bad as you make him either. It’s typical of some impatient fans to write him off after 2 games in a new system (with a minor injury to boot) I think that’s way too premature and far to impatient this early in. I choose to judge players by their season, 1-2 games is a poor sample size. First, you completely rewrote what I said, which is odd because you could’ve just “quoted” me, which would’ve been more appropriate if you’re making an argument about something you claim someone stated. Kinda odd way to present an argument and lends suspicion as to why you chose to change my statement? I have a hard enough time defending stupid stuff I say without defending stupid stuff i didn’t say! Anyway I’ll give you benefit of the doubt there ;) Regardless. I don’t think us missing one underperforming player (Graham) implies Denver is going to be an “easy” victory. That’s quite a leap from me saying we can still win if Graham is not playing this week (if anything that could be implied as Denver is that good) It’s also not consistent with my larger thought process of how to go about winning games, so it wouldn’t ever be intentionally implied by me as it’s contrary to my macro philosophy. Id never underestimate my opponent, that’s a foolish way to prepare for any contest. Now if I said we could win without Rodgers? Or if I said put Tim Boyle in there? That would more constitute the implication we can win “easy”. Us Winning without Graham this week at home? With this Defense? You don’t need to discount the Denver Broncos or be a Prophet in a foreign land to make that connection. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
SudsMcBucky
gopkrs
milani
Latest posts
NFC North Predictions
Latest: milani
5 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
First Round Pick #23 - Matthew Golden WR - Texas
Latest: Pkrjones
55 minutes ago
Draft Talk
H
State of our former QB, Aaron Rodgers
Latest: Heyjoe4
57 minutes ago
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
I’ve been absent sort of but now I’m back
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Yesterday at 11:22 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
NFC North Draft Review (2025)
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Yesterday at 11:03 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Jimmy Graham's blocking
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top